While Individual Investors Own 31% of China Everbright Bank Company Limited (SHSE:601818), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 51% Ownership
While Individual Investors Own 31% of China Everbright Bank Company Limited (SHSE:601818), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 51% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- China Everbright Bank's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
- 18% of China Everbright Bank is held by Institutions
- 中国光大银行重要的私营企业所有权表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响
- 该公司的多数股份由2位投资者持有,占有54%的所有权。
- 光大银行18%的股份由机构持有
If you want to know who really controls China Everbright Bank Company Limited (SHSE:601818), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 51% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道谁真正控制中国光大银行有限公司(SHSE:601818),那么您需要查看其股东名册的构成。私营企业拥有51%的股份,是公司中持股最多的个体。换句话说,该团体将从其对该公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。
Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 31% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面,个人投资者占公司股东的31%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of China Everbright Bank.
在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注中国光大银行不同的持股群体。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Everbright Bank?
机构持股告诉我们中国光大银行的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Everbright Bank. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Everbright Bank's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在中国光大银行拥有相当大比重。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且喜欢。但和其他人一样,他们也可能错误。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会存在它们在"拥挤交易"中的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能竞相快速抛售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到中国光大银行的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更为复杂。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Everbright Bank. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is China Everbright Group Ltd. with 47% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 3.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我们注意到对中国光大银行的投资并不重要。根据我们的数据,中国光大集团有限公司是最大的股东,持有47%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的7.1%和3.9%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of China Everbright Bank
中国光大银行的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我们注意到我们的数据不显示任何董事会成员持有股份。考虑到我们没有掌握内部持股情况,我们可能有缺失的数据。因此,有趣的是评估首席执行官的薪酬和任期。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in China Everbright Bank. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,在光大银行持有31%的股份。 尽管这个群体不能必然左右决策,但肯定可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 51%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同团体确实很值得思考,但还有更重要的因素。事实证明,我们发现了一条有关国邦制药的警告信息,您应该注意。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that China Everbright Bank is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我发现查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。 但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 请注意,在我们的投资分析中,中国光大水务显示了一个警告信号,您应该了解...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。