Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 86% of the Company
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 86% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Stifel Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构在stifel financial的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股价有重大影响
- 14位最大股东持有该业务的51%。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制着Stifel Financial Corp. (纽交所:SF),重要的是要了解业务的所有权结构。我们可以看到机构拥有公司86%的所有权。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stifel Financial.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关stifel financial的什么。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stifel Financial?
机构所有权信息对stifel financial有何启示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Stifel Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Stifel Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
stifel financial已经有机构出现在股东名册上。事实上,他们在公司拥有一定比例的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会判断错误。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得关注stifel financial以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Stifel Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.0% and 6.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Ronald Kruszewski directly holds 1.3% of the total shares outstanding.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。stifel financial 不是对冲基金所持有。我们的数据显示,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股东,持有10%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股份的9.0%和6.5%。此外,公司CEO Ronald Kruszewski 直接持有流通股份的1.3%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记簿中可以看出,51%的股权由前14名股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Stifel Financial
stifel financial 的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Stifel Financial Corp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$407m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据显示,Stifel Financial Corp.的内部持有一些股份。内部持有者持有价值40700万美元的股份。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间存在良好的利益一致性。不过,检查一下这些内部持有者是否在卖出股份可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Stifel Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在Stifel Financial持有10%的股份。虽然这一群体可能无法左右公司的决策,但确实可以对公司的经营产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Stifel Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Stifel Financial has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.
始终值得思考不同的股东群体。但要更好地了解stifel financial,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。拿风险举例 - stifel financial有3个警示信号(其中1个不容忽视)我们认为您应该了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。