Institutional Investors in Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ:CNDT) See US$59m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ:CNDT) See US$59m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Conduent's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 显著较高的机构持有意味着Conduent的股票价格对它们的交易行为敏感。
- 总共有11家投资者拥有该公司52%的所有权
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Conduent Incorporated (NASDAQ:CNDT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制了Conduent Incorporated (纳斯达克:CNDT),理解其业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有公司最多股份的群体,大约73%,是机构。换句话说,这群体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$59m last week. However, the 34% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
机构投资者在公司市值上周下降了5900万美元后遭受了最大的损失。然而,34%的年回报率可能帮助减轻了他们的整体损失。不过,他们应该留意未来可能出现的进一步损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Conduent.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于conduent的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Conduent?
机构持股情况告诉我们关于conduent的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Conduent does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Conduent's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到conduent确实有机构投资者,他们持有相当一部分公司的股票。这可以表明,该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持谨慎。他们有时也会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得关注一下conduent的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Conduent. Our data shows that Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC is the largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 7.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Clifford Skelton, the CEO has 2.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对conduent的对冲基金并没有明显的投资。我们的数据显示Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC是最大的股东,持有9.4%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有8.2%和7.9%的流通股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官Clifford Skelton持有2.5%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记册,我们可以看到11个头寸最大的股东控制着52%的所有权,这意味着没有单个股东拥有的权益超过了多数权益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of Conduent
conduent的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Conduent Incorporated. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$53m worth of the US$627m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
股东们可能会对内部人士拥有Conduent Incorporated的股份感兴趣。作为个人,内部人士集体拥有价值5300万美元的股份,在公司总价值62700万美元中占有一部分。这至少显示出一定的对齐。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有买入或卖出的情况。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Conduent. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众,通常是个人投资者,持有Conduent 19%的股份。虽然这样的股份规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Conduent is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,conduent显示出两个警告信号,您应该知道……
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。