With 69% Institutional Ownership, Hawkins, Inc. (NASDAQ:HWKN) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 69% Institutional Ownership, Hawkins, Inc. (NASDAQ:HWKN) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Hawkins' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著高的機構持股意味着Hawkins的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前15名股東持有該公司50%的業務。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Hawkins, Inc. (NASDAQ:HWKN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 69% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了Hawkins, Inc.(納斯達克:HWKN),你需要查看其股東登記的構成。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有大部分股份,達到了69%的持股比例。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hawkins, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解霍金斯的每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hawkins?
機構所有權告訴我們關於霍金斯什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Hawkins does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hawkins' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到霍金斯確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的一大部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠的交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭着快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到霍金斯的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多的內容。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hawkins. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 4.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Patrick Hawkins directly holds 1.6% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到,對霍金斯的對沖基金並沒有進行重大投資。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,持有15%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.1%和4.8%的流通股。此外,該公司的首席執行官帕特里克·霍金斯直接持有1.6%的總流通股。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Hawkins
霍金斯的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Hawkins, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$102m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會有興趣了解到內部人士在霍金斯公司持有股票。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的利益一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有約10200萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想進一步探討內部人士的利益一致性問題,可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Hawkins. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在霍金斯公司持有22%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能決定事務,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。