Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Cardlytics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CDLX) Latest 26% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Cardlytics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CDLX) Latest 26% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cardlytics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 19 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著較高的機構持股意味着cardlytics的股票價格對它們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前19大股東持有該公司50%的股份。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cardlytics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDLX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 49% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正掌控了cardlytics, inc.(納斯達克:CDLX),重要的是理解該業務的股權結構。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約49%準確地說,是機構。換句話說,該群體可以從其投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 26% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 57% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Cardlytics which might hurt individual investors.
在上週公司股價下跌26%後,機構投資者遭受了最高的損失。這類投資者可能對當前的損失尤爲擔憂,這使得股東的年損失達到57%。機構或稱爲「流動性提供者」的投資者控制着大量資金,因此這些類型的投資者通常對股票價格波動有很大影響。因此,如果下跌持續,機構投資者可能會受到壓力出售cardlytics,這可能會影響到散戶投資者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cardlytics.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於cardlytics的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cardlytics?
機構持股對我們了解cardlytics有什麼啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Cardlytics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cardlytics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到cardlytics確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這在專業投資者中暗示着一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一點,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有同一只股票時,總有風險他們陷入「擁擠的交易」。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個參與者可能會競相迅速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到cardlytics的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,情況總是更復雜。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 13% of Cardlytics. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is CAS Investment Partners, LLC, with ownership of 13%. With 6.2% and 5.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們的數據顯示對沖基金持有cardlytics 13%的股份。 這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。 公司的最大股東是CAS投資合夥公司,擁有13%的股份。 其次和第三大股東分別是貝萊德公司和先鋒集團,持有6.2%和5.3%的流通股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前19名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Cardlytics
cardlytics的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Cardlytics, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$172m, and insiders have US$3.9m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部聯繫人持有Cardlytics, Inc.的部分股票。它的市值僅爲17200萬美元,而內部聯繫人名下的股票價值390萬美元。有人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性,儘管我們通常更喜歡看到更大額的內部持股。但值得檢查的是這些內部人士是否在賣出股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cardlytics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公共投資者持有36%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對Cardlytics有一定程度的影響。儘管這樣的股份規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cardlytics better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Cardlytics you should know about.
考慮到公司中擁有股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地了解cardlytics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,我們發現了 cardlytics 的 3 個警告信號 你應該知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。