Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) Gained 24%, Institutions Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) Gained 24%, Institutions Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要见解
- IonQ's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 38% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- IonQ的重要个人投资者所有权表明关键决策受更大公众股东的影响
- 前25名股东持有该业务的38%。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着IonQ公司(纽交所:IONQ),那么您需要看一下其股权登记簿的构成。个人投资者持有54%的股份,是公司中持股最多的人群。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 24% price gain, institutions also received a 36% cut.
尽管个人投资者在上周股价上涨24%后获益最多,但机构也获得了36%的股份。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about IonQ.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对IonQ有什么可以告诉我们的。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IonQ?
机构投资者的持股情况告诉我们关于IonQ的什么信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that IonQ does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see IonQ's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到IonQ确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司的很大一部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。当多家机构拥有一支股票时,总有可能存在‘拥挤的交易’风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到IonQ的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事永远没有止境。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in IonQ. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.8%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.5% and 3.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对IonQ而言,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有9.8%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有6.5%和3.4%的流通股。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of IonQ
IonQ的内部股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in IonQ, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$565m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据表明,一些内部人士拥有IonQ, Inc.的股份。内部人士持有价值56500万美元的资产,大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。大多数人会认为这显示了股东和董事会之间利益的一致性。不过,值得注意的是,这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of IonQ. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
IonQ的54%股权归属于一般公众,包括零售投资者。这种所有权水平赋予来自更广泛公众的投资者某种影响力,以影响董事会组成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率等关键政策决策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand IonQ better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with IonQ (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
始终值得考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体。但要更好地了解IonQ,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,考虑一下投资风险这个永远存在的威胁。我们已经确认了IonQ的3个警示信号(至少有1个有点不愉快),了解它们应该成为您的投资过程中的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。