share_log

With 87% Ownership, Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 87% Ownership, Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

拥有87%股权的Trinity Industries,Inc.(纽交所:TRN)拥有强大的机构支持。
Simply Wall St ·  11/19 05:18

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Trinity Industries' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 6 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,三一工业的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 前6名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

A look at the shareholders of Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看三一工业公司(纽约证券交易所代码:TRN)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为87%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Trinity Industries.

在下图中,我们放大了三一工业的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:TRN Ownership Breakdown November 19th 2024
纽约证券交易所:TRN 所有权明细 2024 年 11 月 19 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trinity Industries?

关于三一工业,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Trinity Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trinity Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所见,机构投资者在三一工业中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看三一工业的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:TRN Earnings and Revenue Growth November 19th 2024
纽约证券交易所:TRN 收益和收入增长 2024 年 11 月 19 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Trinity Industries. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.8% of the stock.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对三一工业进行有意义的投资。贝莱德公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的16%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约12%和6.8%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前六名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Trinity Industries

三一工业的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Trinity Industries, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$46m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有三一工业公司的股份。内部人士持有价值4600万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Trinity Industries. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有三一工业12%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Trinity Industries has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。举个风险为例——三一工业有3个警告信号(其中一个不容忽视),我们认为你应该知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发