Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good CyberArk Software's (NASDAQ:CYBR) Earnings Are
Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good CyberArk Software's (NASDAQ:CYBR) Earnings Are
CyberArk Software Ltd. (NASDAQ:CYBR) just reported healthy earnings but the stock price didn't move much. Investors are probably missing some underlying factors which are encouraging for the future of the company.
CyberArk軟件有限公司(NASDAQ:CYBR)剛剛報告了健康的收益,但股價並沒有大幅波動。投資者可能會忽略一些潛在的因素,這些因素對公司未來發展是鼓舞人心的。
Zooming In On CyberArk Software's Earnings
深入研究CyberArk軟件的收益情況
Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.
很多投資者並不了解從現金流量表中計算的預付賬款率,但它實際上是衡量公司利潤由自由現金流(FCF)支撐情況的有用指標。簡單地講,這個比率將自由現金流(FCF)從淨利潤中減去,然後除以該期間公司的平均營運資產。這一比率告訴我們公司多少利潤不由自由現金流支撐。
As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".
因此,負的應計比率對公司來說是積極的,而正的應計比率則是消極的。雖然應計比率高於零並不值得擔心,但當公司有相對較高的應計比率時,我們認爲這值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek 2014年的一篇論文:「應計比率較高的公司未來往往利潤較低」。
CyberArk Software has an accrual ratio of -0.57 for the year to September 2024. That indicates that its free cash flow quite significantly exceeded its statutory profit. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$206m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of US$12.6m. CyberArk Software's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Unfortunately for shareholders, the company has also been issuing new shares, diluting their share of future earnings.
CyberArk軟件在2024年9月的一年中具有-0.57的應計比率。這表明其自由現金流大大超過了其法定利潤。事實上,去年它的自由現金流達20600萬美元,遠遠超過了法定利潤的1260萬美元。CyberArk軟件的自由現金流在過去一年有所改善,這通常是好事。不幸的是,對股東來說,公司還在發行新股,稀釋了他們對未來收益的所佔份額。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
To understand the value of a company's earnings growth, it is imperative to consider any dilution of shareholders' interests. As it happens, CyberArk Software issued 5.4% more new shares over the last year. That means its earnings are split among a greater number of shares. To talk about net income, without noticing earnings per share, is to be distracted by the big numbers while ignoring the smaller numbers that talk to per share value. Check out CyberArk Software's historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.
要理解一家公司收益增長的價值,必須考慮股東利益的任何稀釋。 實際上,cyberark軟件在過去一年發行了5.4%的新股。 這意味着其收益被分攤到更多的股份上。 談論淨利潤,而不注意每股收益,就是被大數目分散注意力,而忽視了與每股價值相關的較小數目。 單擊此鏈接查看cyberark軟件的歷史EPS增長。
How Is Dilution Impacting CyberArk Software's Earnings Per Share (EPS)?
稀釋如何影響cyberark軟件的每股收益(EPS)?
Three years ago, CyberArk Software lost money. And even focusing only on the last twelve months, we don't have a meaningful growth rate because it made a loss a year ago, too. But mathematics aside, it is always good to see when a formerly unprofitable business come good (though we accept profit would have been higher if dilution had not been required). And so, you can see quite clearly that dilution is influencing shareholder earnings.
三年前,cyberark軟件虧損。 甚至只集中在過去十二個月,我們也無法得出有意義的增長率,因爲一年前也虧損了。 但撇開數學不談,看到一個曾經沒有盈利的企業變得盈利總是令人高興的(儘管我們承認如果不需要稀釋則利潤本應更高)。 因此,您可以清楚地看到稀釋正在影響股東的收益。
If CyberArk Software's EPS can grow over time then that drastically improves the chances of the share price moving in the same direction. However, if its profit increases while its earnings per share stay flat (or even fall) then shareholders might not see much benefit. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.
如果cyberark軟件的每股收益隨着時間的推移而增長,則股價朝着同一方向移動的機會就會大大提高。 但是,如果其利潤增加而每股收益保持不變(甚至下降)則股東可能看不到太多好處。 出於這個原因,可以說每股收益從長遠來看比淨利潤更重要,假設目標是評估公司股價是否可能增長。
Our Take On CyberArk Software's Profit Performance
我們對CyberArk軟件的利潤表現的看法
In conclusion, CyberArk Software has a strong cashflow relative to earnings, which indicates good quality earnings, but the dilution means its earnings per share are dropping faster than its profit. Considering all the aforementioned, we'd venture that CyberArk Software's profit result is a pretty good guide to its true profitability, albeit a bit on the conservative side. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. You'd be interested to know, that we found 1 warning sign for CyberArk Software and you'll want to know about it.
總之,相對於收益,cyberark軟件的現金流較強,這表明其質量良好,但稀釋意味着其每股收益下降速度比其利潤更快。 考慮到前述所有情況,我們認爲cyberark軟件的利潤結果是其真實盈利能力的一個相當好的指南,儘管可能有點保守。 請記住,在分析股票時值得注意相關風險。 您肯定會很感興趣,我們發現了1個關於cyberark軟件的警告標誌,您會想了解。
Our examination of CyberArk Software has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
我們對CyberArk Software進行的審查側重於某些因素,這些因素可能使其盈利看起來比實際情況更好。但如果您能夠專注於細微之處,總會有更多發現。例如,許多人認爲高淨資產收益率是良好商業經濟的指標,而其他人則喜歡「跟隨資金」並尋找內部人員正在購買的股票。因此,您可能希望查看這份自由收集的公司,這些公司以高淨資產收益率爲特點,或者這份內部人員持股比較高的股票名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。