SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that SharkNinja, Inc. (NYSE:SN) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
霍華德·馬克斯說得好,他說的不是擔心股價的波動,而是 「永久損失的可能性是我擔心的風險... 也是我認識的每位實際投資者所擔心的風險。」因此,很明顯,當你考慮任何給定股票的風險時,你需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務會使公司陷入困境。我們注意到,SharkNinja, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SN)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會成爲風險。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能會一無所獲。但是,更頻繁(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。當然,許多公司使用債務爲增長提供資金,而不會產生任何負面影響。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is SharkNinja's Net Debt?
SharkNinja 的淨負債是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 SharkNinja had US$960.3m of debt, an increase on US$804.6m, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$127.9m, its net debt is less, at about US$832.4m.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年9月,SharkNinja在一年內有9.603億美元的債務,比8.046億美元有所增加。但是,由於其現金儲備爲1.279億美元,其淨負債較少,約爲8.324億美元。
How Strong Is SharkNinja's Balance Sheet?
SharkNinja 的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, SharkNinja had liabilities of US$1.51b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$932.6m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$127.9m as well as receivables valued at US$1.19b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$1.12b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
根據上次報告的資產負債表,SharkNinja的負債爲151億美元,12個月後到期的負債爲9.326億美元。除這些債務外,它有1.279億美元的現金以及價值11.9億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出11.2億美元。
Since publicly traded SharkNinja shares are worth a very impressive total of US$13.9b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由於公開交易的SharkNinja股票總價值驚人,達到139億美元,因此這種負債水平似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。但是,有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東今後繼續監督資產負債表。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
爲了擴大公司相對於收益的負債規模,我們計算其淨負債除以其扣除利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA)和其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)除以其利息支出(利息保障)。這樣,我們既要考慮債務的絕對數量,也要考慮爲其支付的利率。
With net debt sitting at just 1.3 times EBITDA, SharkNinja is arguably pretty conservatively geared. And it boasts interest cover of 8.6 times, which is more than adequate. In addition to that, we're happy to report that SharkNinja has boosted its EBIT by 65%, thus reducing the spectre of future debt repayments. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine SharkNinja's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
由於淨負債僅爲息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的1.3倍,可以說,SharkNinja的財務狀況相當保守。而且它的利息覆蓋率爲8.6倍,這已經足夠了。除此之外,我們很高興地報告,SharkNinja已將其息稅前利潤提高了65%,從而減少了對未來債務償還的擔憂。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,未來的收益將決定SharkNinja未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, SharkNinja recorded free cash flow of 22% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,不能用會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。縱觀最近三年,SharkNinja的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的22%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, SharkNinja's impressive EBIT growth rate implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But truth be told we feel its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow does undermine this impression a bit. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like SharkNinja is pretty sensible with its use of debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with SharkNinja , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
令人高興的是,SharkNinja令人印象深刻的息稅前利潤增長率意味着它在債務方面佔了上風。但說實話,我們認爲它將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流確實會稍微破壞這種印象。當我們考慮上述一系列因素時,SharkNinja使用債務似乎非常明智。這意味着他們正在承擔更多的風險,希望提高股東的回報。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。我們已經確定了SharkNinja的1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果你有興趣投資能夠在沒有債務負擔的情況下增加利潤的企業,請查看這份資產負債表上有淨現金的成長型企業的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。