share_log

Darbond Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:688035) Insiders, Who Hold 30% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

Darbond Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:688035) Insiders, Who Hold 30% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

达邦科技有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:688035)的内部人士持有该公司30%的股份,对于最近的回调感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/21 08:18

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Darbond Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 达邦科技显著的内部持股表明对公司扩张的固有利益
  • 总共有5位投资者拥有该公司51%的所有权。
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Darbond Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:688035), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 30% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制着达邦科技有限公司(SHSE:688035),了解公司的所有权结构非常重要。持有最大股份的群体是占有30%股份的个人内部人士。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As market cap fell to CN¥5.4b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

上周市值下跌至54亿人民币,内部人士面临的损失超过了公司其他股东群体。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Darbond Technology, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解Darbond科技的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
SHSE:688035 Ownership Breakdown November 21st 2024
SHSE:688035 所有权分布 2024年11月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Darbond Technology?

机构所有权告诉我们关于Darbond科技什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Darbond Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Darbond Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Darbond科技中拥有相当的股份。这在一定程度上表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但是,我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总存在着他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方可能会争相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以看到Darbond科技的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的故事。

big
SHSE:688035 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 21st 2024
SHSE:688035 2024年11月21日的收益和营业收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Darbond Technology. Huaxin Investment Management Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. Haihua Xie is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Guocheng Lin holds about 9.4% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Tianan Chen directly holds 2.2% of the total shares outstanding.

我们注意到对达邦科技的对冲基金投资没有实质性意义。华信投资管理有限公司目前是公司最大的股东,持有19%的流通股份。谢海华是第二大股东,持有11%的普通股,林国诚持有约9.4%的公司股票。此外,公司CEO陈天安直接持有2.2%的流通股份。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察后,我们发现前五大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中有很大的发言权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。

Insider Ownership Of Darbond Technology

达邦科技的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Darbond Technology Co., Ltd. Insiders own CN¥1.6b worth of shares in the CN¥5.4b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起来内部人士拥有达邦科技有限公司相当大的一部分股份。内部人士在这家市值54亿的公司中持有价值16亿人民币的股票。看到内部人士如此投入业务真是太好了。值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否有买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众,包括零售投资者,在该公司中持有25%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。尽管占有相当大的股份,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能无法改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in Darbond Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

股权投资公司在达邦科技持有19%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响。一些人可能会喜欢这样,因为股权投资有时是激进派,会让管理层负起责任。但有时,股权投资则是在卖出,已经将公司公开上市。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到私人公司持有发行股份的18%。这个事实本身很难得出任何结论,所以值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Darbond Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Darbond Technology (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考虑拥有公司股票的不同群体总是值得的。但是为了更好地了解达邦科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现达邦科技有三个警告信号(其中一个让我们感到不太舒服!)在您投资之前应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发