Does Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Bunge Global (NYSE:BG) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Bunge Global SA (NYSE:BG) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
傳奇基金經理李錄(得到了查理·芒格的支持)曾經說過:'最大的投資風險不是價格的波動性,而是是否會遭受資本的永久損失。' 當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡看看它對債務的利用,因爲債務過載可能導致毀滅。與許多其他公司一樣,邦吉全球SA(紐交所:BG)利用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務造成了多少風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業發展的工具,但如果一家企業無力償還債務,那麼它存在於債權人的控制之下。資本主義的一個重要部分是'創造性毀滅'過程,即失敗的企業被無情地清算。然而,更普遍(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,一家公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東,以控制債務。當然,債務的好處在於,它通常代表廉價的資本,特別是當它取代公司具有高回報能力的重投能力時。在考慮一家公司的債務利用時,我們首先看現金和債務。
What Is Bunge Global's Debt?
邦吉全球的債務是多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Bunge Global had US$6.20b of debt, up from US$5.18b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$3.01b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$3.18b.
正如您在下文所看到的,在2024年9月底,邦吉全球的債務爲62億美元,比一年前的51.8億美元有所增加。點擊圖片查看更多詳細信息。然而,它持有30.1億美元現金來抵消這個金額,導致淨債務約爲31.8億美元。

How Strong Is Bunge Global's Balance Sheet?
邦吉全球的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Bunge Global had liabilities of US$7.69b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$6.42b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$3.01b as well as receivables valued at US$2.67b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$8.43b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
根據最近公佈的資產負債表,邦吉全球有760億美元的負債需要在12個月內償還,及64.2億美元的長期負債。抵消這些義務,它有30.1億美元的現金,以及26.7億美元的應收賬款需在12個月內償還。因此,其負債總額超過84.3億美元,超過了其現金和近期應收賬款的總和。
This is a mountain of leverage even relative to its gargantuan market capitalization of US$12.5b. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
即使相對於其125億美元的巨大市值來說,這是一座可觀的槓桿山。如果其貸款人要求其加固資產負債表,股東很可能面臨嚴重的稀釋。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。
While Bunge Global's low debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.3 suggests only modest use of debt, the fact that EBIT only covered the interest expense by 5.6 times last year does give us pause. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. Shareholders should be aware that Bunge Global's EBIT was down 33% last year. If that decline continues then paying off debt will be harder than selling foie gras at a vegan convention. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Bunge Global's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
儘管邦吉全球低1.3的債務至EBITDA比率表明只是適度地使用了債務,然而,去年EBIt僅能支付利息支出的5.6倍之事使我們感到擔憂。但利息支付顯然足以讓我們思考其債務的可承受性。股東應該注意,邦吉全球的EBIt去年下降了33%。如果這種下降持續下去,那麼償還債務就會比在純素食者大會上出售鵝肝更困難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但更重要的是未來收入,將決定邦吉全球未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, Bunge Global burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,業務需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不足夠。因此,值得檢查那些EBIt有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年裏,邦吉全球消耗了大量現金。雖然這可能是爲了增長而支出,但這確實使債務變得更加風險。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both Bunge Global's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of (not) growing its EBIT make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its net debt to EBITDA is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We're quite clear that we consider Bunge Global to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. For this reason we're pretty cautious about the stock, and we think shareholders should keep a close eye on its liquidity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Bunge Global .
坦率地說,邦吉全球將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的轉換和其EBIt沒有增長的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到不安。但是從好的一面來看,其淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率是一個好跡象,讓我們更加樂觀。我們非常清楚地認爲邦吉全球實際上相當風險,這是由於其資產負債表的健康狀況導致的。因此,我們對該股持謹慎態度,並認爲股東應該密切關注其流動性。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的地方。然而,並非所有的投資風險都在資產負債表之內——恰恰相反。因此,您應該注意我們發現的邦吉全球的1個警告信號。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。