In the Wake of Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPEN) Latest US$50m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions
In the Wake of Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPEN) Latest US$50m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Opendoor Technologies' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 鉴于机构在股票中持有的巨大股份,opendoor technologies的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前15名股东持有该公司50%的业务。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制了opendoor technologies公司(纳斯达克:OPEN),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,机构在公司中占据了大部分股份,拥有55%的股份。换句话说,这一群体从他们对公司的投资中最有可能获得最大收益(或承受最大损失)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$50m. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 31% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Opendoor Technologies, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,上周机构投资者遭受了最高的损失,因为市值下降了5000万美元。这类投资者可能尤其关心目前的亏损,这使得股东的年亏损达到了31%。通常被称为"市场推动者"的机构在影响股票价格动态方面具有重要的力量。因此,如果下行趋势持续,机构可能面临卖出opendoor technologies的压力,这可能对个别投资者产生负面影响。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Opendoor Technologies.
在下面的图表中,我们着重分析了opendoor technologies的不同持有群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Opendoor Technologies?
机构持股告诉我们关于opendoor technologies的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Opendoor Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Opendoor Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
opendoor technologies已经在股东名册上有机构存在。 实际上,他们在公司的股份占有相当的份额。这可以表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证最好保持警惕。他们有时也会出错。如果两位大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,出现大幅股价下跌并不少见。因此,查看opendoor technologies的过去盈余轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,值得记住的是,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Opendoor Technologies. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Access Industries, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.5%. Furthermore, CEO Carrie Wheeler is the owner of 2.0% of the company's shares.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对冲基金在opendoor technologies 的持股不多。目前,先锋集团(Vanguard Group, Inc.)是公司最大的股东,持有12%的流通股。第二和第三大股东分别是Access Industries, Inc.和BlackRock, Inc.,他们的持股比例相等,均为7.5%。此外,首席执行官卡丽·惠勒(Carrie Wheeler)持有公司2.0%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前15名股东在公司中拥有50%的组合持股,这表明没有单一的股东对公司拥有重大控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Opendoor Technologies
opendoor technologies 的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Opendoor Technologies Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$38m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以报告,内部人士确实拥有opendoor technologies的股份。 这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意义的利益一致性通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有约3800万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 大多数人会说这显示了股东与董事会之间的利益一致性。不过,还是值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通大众,包括零售投资者,持有该公司34%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这样的持有量不足以左右政策决策方向,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 7.5%, of the Opendoor Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎私人公司持有opendoor technologies的7.5%的股票。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而不是以个人身份在上市公司中拥有兴趣。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这个领域需要进一步研究。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Opendoor Technologies is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我觉得研究谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,opendoor technologies在我们的投资分析中显示出5个警告信号,您应该了解...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。