Retail Investors Invested in Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.7b Market Cap Decline
Retail Investors Invested in Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.7b Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
主要見解
- Sealand Securities' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 50% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 國海證券的重要零售投資者所有權表明關鍵決策受更廣大公衆的股東影響
- 前12名股東持有該業務的50%。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 49% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着國海證券股份有限公司(SZSE:000750),重要的是了解企業的所有權結構。零售投資者持有公司股份的49%,在公司中擁有最多股份。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大利潤(或蒙受最大損失)。
As a result, retail investors as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥1.7b.
結果,零售投資者作爲一組,在上週市值下降了17億人民幣後遭受最高損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sealand Securities, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解國海證券的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sealand Securities?
機構持股告訴我們國海證券的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Sealand Securities does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sealand Securities, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到國海證券確實有機構投資者; 他們持有公司的一大部分股票。 這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們很喜歡。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。 如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一支股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。 因此,值得檢查國海證券的過去收益軌跡,(以下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sealand Securities. The company's largest shareholder is Guangxi Investment Group Co.,Ltd, with ownership of 30%. With 4.4% and 3.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Guangxi Industrial Investment Capital Operation Group Co., Ltd. and Guangxi Wuzhou Zhongheng Group Co.,Ltd are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們注意到,對國海證券沒有一個有意義的投資的對沖基金。該公司最大的股東是廣西投資集團有限公司,持股30%。持有的股份分別爲4.4%和3.8%,廣西工業投資資金運作集團有限公司和廣西吳州中恒集團有限公司分別是第二和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我們對所有權的深入研究表明,前12名股東合計擁有50%的持股,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Sealand Securities
國海證券的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆在江西國科防務集團有限公司中持有31%的股份。雖然這個團體不一定能夠控制公司,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 49% stake in Sealand Securities. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通市民通常是個人投資者,在國海證券持有49%的股份。 雖然這個群體不能必然決定事務,但確實可以對公司的運營產生實質性影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 37%, of the Sealand Securities stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
國海證券股東中,私人公司擁有37%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查擁有這些私人公司的人。有時候內部人員或其他相關方通過獨立的私人公司持有公共公司股份。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 7.1% of Sealand Securities. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我們發現,公共公司擁有國海證券的7.1%。很難確定,但這表明它們之間有交織的業務利益。這可能是戰略性持股,因此值得密切關注所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Sealand Securities you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.
我發現研究公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲取見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。案例是:我們發現了國海證券的3個警示信號,您應該知曉其中有1個不容忽視。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。