share_log

Institutional Investors Are Uber Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:UBER) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$4.6b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Uber Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:UBER) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$4.6b Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是優步科技公司(紐交所:UBER)最大的下注者,經過上週46億美金市值的增長,他們得到了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/25 18:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Uber Technologies implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構對優步科技的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有着重要影響力
  • 共有18位投資者持有該公司超過50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

審視優步科技公司(紐交所:UBER)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最爲強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司84%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面對最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 3.1% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 28% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

作爲結果,機構投資者在上週股價上漲3.1%後獲得了最豐厚的回報。目前投資的一年回報率爲28%,上週的漲幅將會受到更多歡迎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Uber Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解優步科技每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:UBER Ownership Breakdown November 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所: 優步科技所有權拆分2024年11月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Uber Technologies?

機構投資者所持股權對於優步科技有何啓示?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Uber Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Uber Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

優步科技已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有一部分可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲有時即使是機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一支股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下降。因此,值得檢查優步科技的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NYSE:UBER Earnings and Revenue Growth November 25th 2024
紐交所:優步2024年11月25日的收益和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Uber Technologies. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.5% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對優步科技的投資基金並不具有實質性投資。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股東,持有已發行股份的8.5%。爲了上下文,第二大股東持有約7.0%的已發行股份,第三大股東持有4.5%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前18名股東持有該公司50%的股份,這表明沒有任何單個股東控制着該公司。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Uber Technologies

優步科技的內部股東持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that Uber Technologies, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$218m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息顯示,優步科技股份有限公司的內部持有人僅佔公司不到1%。作爲一家大公司,我們只希望內部持有人擁有很小比例。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值21800萬美元的股份。看到至少部分內部持有總是件好事,但也值得注意這些持有人是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的普通大衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Uber Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Uber Technologies .

考慮到擁有公司股票的不同群體始終是值得的。 但爲了更好地了解優步,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 爲此,您應該注意我們在優步發現的3個警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論