Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHEF) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
霍华德·马克斯很好地表述了这一点,他说,与其担心分享价格的波动,不如说‘我担心的风险是永久性损失的可能性……我认识的每一个实际投资者也都担心这一点。’所以聪明的钱知道,债务 - 通常与破产相关 - 是评估公司风险时一个非常重要的因素。我们可以看到,The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.(纳斯达克:CHEF)在其业务中确实使用了债务。但是更重要的问题是:这些债务带来了多少风险?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
为什么债务会带来风险?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
当企业无法通过自由现金流或以有利价格募资来轻松履行债务和其他负债时,债务和其他负债对企业就会构成风险。资本主义的一部分是“创意毁灭”的过程,其中银行家们无情地清算失败的企业。然而,更频繁但仍然昂贵的情况是公司必须以基准价格发行股票来稳定其资产负债表,从而永久性地稀释股东。当然,对于资本密集型企业,债务可能是一个重要的工具。当我们考虑一家公司的债务使用时,我们首先会看现金和债务的总和。
What Is Chefs' Warehouse's Debt?
Chefs' Warehouse的债务是多少?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Chefs' Warehouse had US$680.6m in debt in September 2024; about the same as the year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$50.7m, its net debt is less, at about US$629.9m.
下面的图表(您可以点击查看更多细节)显示,Chefs' Warehouse在2024年9月的债务为68060万美元;与前一年大致相同。但是,由于它有5070万美元的现金储备,其净债务较少,约为62990万美元。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241125/0-2b163078b9d43c7b521acf48d8ca544f-0-7ade9583cbb44a056c44324470c514c5.png/big)
How Strong Is Chefs' Warehouse's Balance Sheet?
厨师仓库的资产负债表有多强?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Chefs' Warehouse had liabilities of US$429.1m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$864.2m due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$50.7m and US$360.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$882.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
根据最近报告的资产负债表,厨师仓库在12个月内有42910万美元的负债,12个月后有86420万美元的负债。另一方面,它有5070万美元的现金和36000万美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,它的负债总额比它的现金和短期应收账款的总和多88260万美元。
Chefs' Warehouse has a market capitalization of US$1.77b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
厨师仓库的市值为17.7亿美元,因此如果需要,它很可能筹集现金以改善其资产负债表。但显然,我们应该仔细检查它能否在不稀释的情况下管理债务。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
为了衡量公司相对于其收益的债务情况,我们计算其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆盖率)。这种方法的优点是,我们既考虑了债务的绝对量(净负债与 EBITDA),又考虑到了与该债务相关的实际利息支出(其利息覆盖率)。
While we wouldn't worry about Chefs' Warehouse's net debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.5, we think its super-low interest cover of 2.5 times is a sign of high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. However, one redeeming factor is that Chefs' Warehouse grew its EBIT at 17% over the last 12 months, boosting its ability to handle its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Chefs' Warehouse's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
虽然我们不会担心厨师仓库的净债务与EBITDA的比率为3.5,但我们认为其超低的利息覆盖率为2.5倍是高杠杆的迹象。因此,股东们应该意识到,利息费用似乎确实对最近的业务产生了影响。然而,一个值得注意的因素是,厨师仓库在过去12个月内,EBIT增长了17%,增强了其处理债务的能力。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中最能了解债务。但未来的收益,尤其重要,将决定厨师仓库未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,显示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Chefs' Warehouse barely recorded positive free cash flow, in total. Some might say that's a concern, when it comes considering how easily it would be for it to down debt.
最后,一家公司只能用现金偿还债务,而不能用会计利润来偿还。因此,我们总是检查EBIT有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去三年中,厨师仓库几乎没有记录正的自由现金流。考虑到它偿还债务的难易程度,一些人可能会对此表示关注。
Our View
我们的观点
While Chefs' Warehouse's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow makes us cautious about it, its track record of covering its interest expense with its EBIT is no better. At least its EBIT growth rate gives us reason to be optimistic. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Chefs' Warehouse's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Chefs' Warehouse you should know about.
虽然厨师仓库将EBIT转换为自由现金流让我们对其持谨慎态度,但其用EBIT覆盖利息支出的记录也不理想。至少,其EBIT增长率让我们有理由保持乐观。综合考虑上述因素,我们确实认为厨师仓库的债务给业务带来了一些风险。因此,尽管这种杠杆提升了股本回报,我们不希望它在此基础上继续增加。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个好的起点。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中——远非如此。这些风险可能很难被发现。每家公司都有这些风险,而我们发现了一个你需要知道的厨师仓库的预警信号。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天结束时,通常更好地关注那些没有净债务的公司。您可以查看我们特别名单上的这些公司(所有这些公司都有盈利增长记录)。这是免费的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。