The Past Three Years for Sealed Air (NYSE:SEE) Investors Has Not Been Profitable
The Past Three Years for Sealed Air (NYSE:SEE) Investors Has Not Been Profitable
In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Sealed Air Corporation (NYSE:SEE) shareholders, since the share price is down 44% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 26%.
爲了證明選擇個別股票的努力是值得的,努力超越市場指數基金的回報是有意義的。但幾乎可以肯定,有時你會購買回報低於市場平均水平的股票。不幸的是,對於長揸希悅爾公司(紐交所代碼:SEE)的股東來說,情況正是如此,因爲其股價在過去三年中下跌了44%,遠低於市場約26%的回報。
Now let's have a look at the company's fundamentals, and see if the long term shareholder return has matched the performance of the underlying business.
現在讓我們來看一下公司的基本面,看看長期股東回報是否與業務的表現相匹配。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
雖然市場是一個強大的定價機制,但股價反映的是投資者情緒,而不僅僅是基礎業務的表現。一種有缺陷但合理的評估公司情緒變化的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。
Sealed Air saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 3.4% per year, over the last three years. This reduction in EPS is slower than the 18% annual reduction in the share price. So it's likely that the EPS decline has disappointed the market, leaving investors hesitant to buy.
在過去三年中,希悅爾的每股收益(EPS)以每年3.4%的複合率下降。每股收益的下降速度低於股價每年18%的下降。因此,EPS的下降可能使市場感到失望,讓投資者對購買持謹慎態度。
The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
下面的圖像顯示了EPS隨時間的變化(如果你點擊圖像,可以看到更詳細的信息)。

We know that Sealed Air has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? You could check out this free report showing analyst revenue forecasts.
我們知道希悅爾最近改善了其業績,但它會增長營業收入嗎?您可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師的營業收入預測。
What About Dividends?
關於分紅派息的問題
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Sealed Air the TSR over the last 3 years was -41%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
除了衡量股價回報外,投資者還應考慮總股東回報(TSR)。TSR包括任何剝離或折扣融資的價值,以及任何分紅,前提是將分紅再投資。因此,對於支付慷慨分紅的公司,TSR通常要高於股價回報。我們注意到,希悅爾在過去3年的TSR爲-41%,這比上述股價回報要好。這在很大程度上是因爲其分紅支付!
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
Sealed Air shareholders gained a total return of 11% during the year. Unfortunately this falls short of the market return. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it's actually better than the average return of 1.0% over half a decade This could indicate that the company is winning over new investors, as it pursues its strategy. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Even so, be aware that Sealed Air is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
希悅爾股東在這一年獲得了11%的總回報。不幸的是,這低於市場回報。好消息是,這仍然是盈利,實際上比過去五年的平均回報1.0%要好。這可能表明公司正在吸引新投資者,因爲它在推進自己的策略。我發現從長遠來看觀察股價作爲業務表現的代理非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。儘管如此,請注意,希悅爾在我們的投資分析中顯示出了一個警告信號,您應該了解...
If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation).
如果你喜歡與管理層一起買入股票,那麼你可能會喜歡這個免費的公司名單。(提示:很多公司鮮爲人知,而且估值吸引。)
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在美國交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。