Private Companies Are Changjiang Publishing & Media Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600757) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥437m
Private Companies Are Changjiang Publishing & Media Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600757) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥437m
Key Insights
主要见解
- Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 56% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Hubei Changjiang Publishing & Media Group Company Limited)
- Institutions own 17% of Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd
- 长江出版传媒有限公司的重要私人公司所有权表明,关键决策受到较大公众股东的影响
- 公司的56%由一家股东持有(湖北长江出版传媒集团有限公司)
- 机构持有长江出版传媒有限公司17%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Changjiang Publishing & Media Co.,Ltd (SHSE:600757), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制着长江出版传媒股份有限公司(SHSE: 600757),重要的是理解业务的所有权结构。持有公司最大份额的是私人公司,拥有57%的所有权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将获益最多(或者如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。
And following last week's 4.1% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.
而在上周股价下跌4.1%之后,私营企业遭受了最大的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于长江出版传媒有限公司的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd?
机构持股告诉我们关于长江出版传媒有限公司的什么信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,长江出版传媒有限公司确实拥有机构投资者; 他们持有公司的一大部分股票。 这意味着那些机构的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。 但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。 如果两家大型机构投资者同时尝试剥离股票,有时会看到股价大幅下跌是很常见的。 所以值得检查长江出版传媒有限公司的过去收益轨迹(如下)。 当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Hubei Changjiang Publishing & Media Group Company Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 56% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.4% and 1.7% of the stock.
长江出版传媒有限公司不是对冲基金持有。湖北长江出版传媒集团有限公司目前是公司最大的股东,持有56%的股份。拥有如此巨大的所有权份额,我们推断他们对公司未来有重大控制。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约2.4%和1.7%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好礼。该股票受到的分析师覆盖范围很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空间获得更多的覆盖范围。
Insider Ownership Of Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd
长江出版传媒有限公司内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我们注意到我们的数据并没有显示任何董事会成员拥有股份。董事会成员至少拥有一些个人持仓是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步是检查CEO的薪酬水平。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般大众,通常是个人投资者,持有长江出版传媒有限公司25%的股份。虽然这一持股比例可能不足以左右政策决定的结果,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 57%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司上市股份的57%。可能值得更深入地研究一下。如果关联方如内部人员在这些私营公司之一拥有利益,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对公司具有战略兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Changjiang Publishing & MediaLtd is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我发现查看公司的股东非常有趣。但要真正获取见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,长江出版传媒有一项警告信号出现在我们的投资分析中,您需要了解...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。