These 4 Measures Indicate That Jabil (NYSE:JBL) Is Using Debt Extensively
These 4 Measures Indicate That Jabil (NYSE:JBL) Is Using Debt Extensively
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Jabil Inc. (NYSE:JBL) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有人认为,作为投资者,最好的风险思考方式是波动性,而不是债务,但沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性与风险远非同义词。” 当您考虑一个公司有多大风险时,自然会考虑其资产负债表,因为当一家企业倒闭时通常涉及债务。 和许多其他公司一样,捷普科技(纽交所:JBL)利用债务。 但是这笔债务是否会让股东担忧呢?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时有危险?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
当公司不能轻松地满足债务或以有吸引力的价格筹集资金时,债务和其他负债对其构成风险。资本主义的组成部分是创造性破坏的过程,失败的企业经常被债权人无情地清算。虽然这并不常见,但我们经常看到负债累累的公司因出借人以低廉的价格强迫其发行股票而不得不不断稀释股东利益。当然,许多公司使用债务来资助其增长,没有产生任何负面后果。考虑公司债务水平时的第一步是将其现金和债务一起考虑。
How Much Debt Does Jabil Carry?
捷普科技负债有多少?
As you can see below, Jabil had US$2.88b of debt, at August 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$2.23b, its net debt is less, at about US$652.0m.
正如下文所示,捷普科技在2024年8月有28.8亿美元的债务,与前一年相当。 您可以单击图表查看更详细信息。 但由于其现金储备为22.3亿美元,其净债务较少,约为65200万美元。

How Healthy Is Jabil's Balance Sheet?
捷普科技的资产负债表有多健康?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Jabil had liabilities of US$11.8b due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.83b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$2.23b and US$4.60b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$8.78b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,捷普科技的一年内到期负债为118亿美元,之后到期的负债为38.3亿美元。另一方面,其现金为22.3亿美元,一年内应收账款为46亿美元。因此,其负债总计比现金和短期应收账款的组合多出87.8亿美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Jabil has a huge market capitalization of US$14.8b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
虽然这可能看起来很多,但由于捷普科技的市值高达148亿美元,所以如果需要的话,它可能通过增加资本来加强其资产负债表。但我们绝对要警惕迹象,表明其债务带来了太多风险。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。
With net debt sitting at just 0.30 times EBITDA, Jabil is arguably pretty conservatively geared. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 8.4 times the interest expense over the last year. But the bad news is that Jabil has seen its EBIT plunge 10% in the last twelve months. We think hat kind of performance, if repeated frequently, could well lead to difficulties for the stock. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Jabil's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
净债务仅为EBITDA的0.30倍,捷普科技的财务杠杆可能相当保守。这种观点得到了扎实的利息覆盖率的支持,过去一年的EBIT是利息支出的8.4倍。但坏消息是,捷普科技过去十二个月看到其EBIT下降了10%。我们认为这种性能,如果经常重复,很可能会给股票带来困难。在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是要重点关注的领域。但最终决定捷普科技能否保持健康资产负债表的是未来收益,而不是其他任何因素。如果你关注未来,可以查看这份免费报告,显示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Jabil's free cash flow amounted to 42% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最后,一家企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润不足以偿还。因此,值得检查多少EBIT得到了自由现金流的支持。在过去三年中,捷普科技的自由现金流占其EBIT的42%,低于我们的预期。这对偿还债务来说并不理想。
Our View
我们的观点
Neither Jabil's ability to grow its EBIT nor its level of total liabilities gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its net debt to EBITDA tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. We think that Jabil's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Jabil (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
捷普科技增长EBIt的能力和总负债水平都没有让我们对其承担更多债务的能力产生信心。但其净负债与EBITDA的比率却讲述了一个完全不同的故事,并且表明了一些韧性。我们认为,考虑到上述数据点后,捷普科技的债务确实使其有些风险。这并不一定是件坏事,因为杠杆可以提高股本回报率,但这也是需要注意的事项。当你分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要重点关注的领域。然而,并不是所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中-远非如此。例如,我们已发现了捷普科技的3个警示信号(其中1个有点令人担忧!),在投资前您应该对此有所了解。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
当一切尘埃落定时,有时更容易专注于那些甚至不需要债务的公司。读者可以立即免费查看零净债务的成长股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。