share_log

Great Week for ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ:TDUP) Institutional Investors After Losing 21% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ:TDUP) Institutional Investors After Losing 21% Over the Previous Year

ThredUp 公司(纳斯达克:TDUP)的机构投资者在过去一年中损失了21%,这是一个伟大的一周。
Simply Wall St ·  11/27 00:54

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ThredUp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 由于机构在股票中的大额持股,ThredUp的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
  • 总共有9个投资者持有该公司50%的股权。
  • 内部人员最近一直在买入。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of ThredUp Inc. (NASDAQ:TDUP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 49% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制着ThredUp Inc.(纳斯达克:TDUP),理解该业务的股权结构非常重要。机构持有49%的股份,是公司最大股东。换句话说,该团体在对公司的投资中能够获得最多(或失去最多)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 58% increase in the share price after a year of 21% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

机构投资者可能会欢迎上周股价上涨58%的消息,这意味着在经历了21%的年度损失后,收益可能开始向更高趋势发展。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ThredUp.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于ThredUp的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:TDUP Ownership Breakdown November 26th 2024
纳斯达克:TDUP的持股分解 2024年11月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ThredUp?

机构持股对ThredUp的意义是什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that ThredUp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ThredUp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到ThredUp确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的相当一部分。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好还是对依赖机构投资者带来的假定验证保持谨慎。他们有时也会犯错。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图卖出股票,看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看ThredUp过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:TDUP Earnings and Revenue Growth November 26th 2024
纳斯达克:TDUP 盈利和营业收入增长 2024年11月26日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ThredUp. The company's largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company, with ownership of 7.7%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO James Reinhart directly holds 3.9% of the total shares outstanding.

我们注意到对冲基金在ThredUp的投资并不显著。公司的最大股东是资本研究与管理公司,拥有7.7%的股份。为了说明,第二大股东持有约6.7%的流通股,第三大股东持有6.4%的股份。此外,公司的CEO詹姆斯·雷因哈特直接持有3.9%的总流通股。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的公司股份由前9大股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被小股东平衡了。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of ThredUp

ThredUp的内部持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in ThredUp Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$176m, and insiders have US$16m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股东们可能会对内部人持有ThredUp Inc.的股票感兴趣。该公司的市值仅为17600万美元,而内部人以自己名义持有价值1600万美元的股票。有些人会认为这表明股东与董事会之间的利益一致,尽管我们一般更倾向于看到内部人持有更多的股份。但检查这些内部人是否有在出售股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公众——包括零售投资者——持有该公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。虽然持有量相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With a stake of 19%, private equity firms could influence the ThredUp board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

持有19%股份的股权投资公司可能会影响ThredUp董事会。 有时我们会看到股权投资者长期留存,但一般而言,他们的投资周期较短——正如名称所示——他们不太会投资于上市公司。经过一段时间,他们可能会考虑卖出并将资金重新投入到其他地方。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for ThredUp (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我发现查看一个公司到底是由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如,我们发现ThredUp有3个警告信号(一个有点不愉快!)在这里投资之前你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发