Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Hangzhou DPtech Technologies Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300768), and the Recent 3.5% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them
Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Hangzhou DPtech Technologies Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300768), and the Recent 3.5% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 内部人员似乎对迪普科技有着浓厚的兴趣,这可以从他们所拥有的大量股权中看出
- 总共有2家投资者持有该公司53%的所有权。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hangzhou DPtech Technologies Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300768), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
为了了解真正控制迪普科技的是谁(SZSE:300768),重要的是了解业务的所有权结构。我们可以看到个别内部人员拥有公司54%的股权。 换句话说,该团体从他们对公司的投资中可能获得最多(或损失最多)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥430m.
结果,营业收入下降了人民币43000万后,内部人作为一个群体遭受了最大的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究一下杭州迪普科技技术有限公司的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd?
机构所有权告诉我们有关杭州迪普科技技术有限公司的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到,杭州迪普科技技术有限公司确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的一大部分。 这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。 但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。 如果多个机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。 因此,看看下面的杭州迪普科技技术有限公司的收益历史是值得的。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd. Our data shows that Shusheng Zheng is the largest shareholder with 46% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 7.1% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Xidian Zou directly holds 1.1% of the total shares outstanding.
对于Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd,对冲基金持有的股份不多。我们的数据显示,Shusheng Zheng是最大的股东,持有46%的股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约7.5%和7.1%的股票。此外,公司的CEO Xidian Zou直接持有总股本的1.1%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 53% stake.
股东注册表的更详细研究向我们展示了,通过他们的53%股份,前2个最大股东在公司中拥有相当大的所有权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd
迪普科技的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Hangzhou DPtech Technologies Co.,Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥6.4b stake in this CN¥12b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
看起来,内部持有杭州迪普科技股份有限公司超过一半的股票。 这使他们拥有很大的权力。 这意味着内部人在这家120亿人民币的企业中拥有价值64亿人民币的股份,看到这种投资水平是不错的。 您可以在这里检查这些内部人是否已经卖出他们的任何股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公众(包括散户投资者)拥有该公司的23%股权,因此他们不容易被忽视。尽管该群体不能一呼百应,但肯定会对公司的运营产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到私人公司持有发行股份的18%。这个事实本身很难得出任何结论,所以值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Hangzhou DPtech TechnologiesLtd .
尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该注意我们在迪普科技有限公司发现的1个警告标志。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。