Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600143) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 58% Stake, While 34% Is Held by Insiders
Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600143) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 58% Stake, While 34% Is Held by Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Kingfa Sci. & Tech indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Kingfa Sci. & Tech is 34%
- 在京发科技中的个人投资者拥有相当大的股份,这表明他们在管理和业务策略中有更大的发言权。
- 前25大股东持有42%的业务。
- 京发科技的内部持股为34%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600143), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 58% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
为了了解谁真正控制着京发科技有限公司(SHSE:600143),了解该业务的所有权结构是很重要的。拥有公司最多股份的一组是个人投资者,准确来说约占58%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这组将获得最大的收益(或在下跌时损失最多)。
And individual insiders on the other hand have a 34% ownership in the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.
另一方面,个人内部人士在公司中拥有34%的股份。大型公司通常由机构作为股东,而我们通常看到内部人士在较小的公司中持有股份。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Kingfa Sci. & Tech, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地探讨金发科技的每种所有者类型,首先是下面的图表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kingfa Sci. & Tech?
机构持股对我们了解金发科技有什么启示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Kingfa Sci. & Tech already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kingfa Sci. & Tech's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
金发科技的股东名册上已经有机构的身影。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经关注到这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能会错。 当多个机构共同持有一只股票时,始终存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个参与者可能会争相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以看到金发科技的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事远不止于此。
Kingfa Sci. & Tech is not owned by hedge funds. Zhimin Yuan is currently the company's largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.7% and 3.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Nan Jing Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
金发科技并不被对冲基金持有。袁志敏目前是该公司的最大股东,持有20%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有4.7%和3.7%的流通股份。第三大股东李南京恰好还担任董事会成员。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。
Insider Ownership Of Kingfa Sci. & Tech
金发科技的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥7.4b stake in this CN¥22b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看来内部人士持有金发科技有限公司相当大比例的股份。看到内部人士在这个价值220亿CN¥的业务中拥有74亿CN¥的可观股份真是很有趣。大多数人会说这表明和股东之间有良好的利益一致性,尤其在这样规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否有在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of Kingfa Sci. & Tech. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
大众,包括散户投资者,持有金发科技58%的股份。凭借这种持有量,散户投资者可以共同参与影响股东回报的决策,例如分红政策和董事的任命。他们还可以行使对可能不会改善盈利能力的收购或合并的投票权。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Kingfa Sci. & Tech is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit concerning...
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常重要的,但还有其他更重要的因素。请注意,金发科技在我们的投资分析中显示出3个警告信号,其中1个信号有点令人担忧...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。