Is FriendLtd (SHSE:605050) Using Too Much Debt?
Is FriendLtd (SHSE:605050) Using Too Much Debt?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Friend Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:605050) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
有些人說,相較於債務,波動性是投資者考慮風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 表示:『波動性與風險遠非同義詞。』 當你審視一家公司有多危險時,自然會考慮其資產負債表,因爲債務往往在公司崩潰時涉及其中。 與許多其他公司一樣,Friend Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:605050) 也使用了債務。但股東應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果一家企業無力償還債務,那麼該企業就處於債權人的控制之下。資本主義的重要組成部分是「創造性摧毀」過程,在這個過程中,失敗的企業會被銀行無情地清算。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是一家公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東,以便控制債務。當然,許多公司利用債務來實現增長,並沒有任何負面後果。當我們考慮一家公司對債務的運用時,我們首先要看現金和債務兩者之間的關係。
What Is FriendLtd's Net Debt?
FriendLtd 的淨債務是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 FriendLtd had debt of CN¥1.52b, up from CN¥231.2m in one year. However, it also had CN¥1.12b in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥405.8m.
下圖可以點擊查看更詳細的信息,顯示到2024年9月,FriendLtd 的債務爲CN¥15.2億,較一年前的CN¥23120萬有所增加。然而,它也有CN¥11.2億的現金,因此其淨債務爲CN¥40580萬。

How Healthy Is FriendLtd's Balance Sheet?
FriendLtd的資產負債表健康狀況如何?
According to the last reported balance sheet, FriendLtd had liabilities of CN¥4.12b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥30.4m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥1.12b as well as receivables valued at CN¥2.77b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by CN¥263.0m.
根據最近報告的資產負債表,FriendLtd在12個月內有CN¥41.2億的負債,12個月以上的負債爲CN¥3040萬。抵消這些義務,它有CN¥11.2億的現金以及在12個月內到期的應收款項價值爲CN¥27.7億。因此,它的負債比現金和(短期)應收款之和多出CN¥26300萬。
Of course, FriendLtd has a market capitalization of CN¥5.15b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.
當然,FriendLtd的市值爲CN¥51.5億,所以這些負債可能是可控的。然而,我們認爲值得關注其資產負債表的強度,因爲這可能會隨時間變化。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。
FriendLtd's net debt is only 0.81 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 428 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. But the bad news is that FriendLtd has seen its EBIT plunge 11% in the last twelve months. If that rate of decline in earnings continues, the company could find itself in a tight spot. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is FriendLtd's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
FriendLtd的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.81倍。其EBIT覆蓋利息支出的倍數高達428倍。所以可以說它的債務沒有比大象對老鼠的威脅更大。但是壞消息是FriendLtd的EBIT在過去十二個月中下滑了11%。如果這種盈利下降的速度繼續下去,公司可能會陷入困境。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到了很多關於債務的知識。但影響資產負債表未來表現的將是FriendLtd的盈利情況。因此,如果你想深入了解其盈利情況,查看這張長期盈利趨勢圖可能會值得。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, FriendLtd burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,儘管稅務官可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸方只接受冷硬的現金。因此,我們顯然需要看看EBIT是否對應於相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,FriendLtd燒掉了大量現金。雖然這可能是出於增長支出的結果,但這確實使債務更加具有風險。
Our View
我們的觀點
Neither FriendLtd's ability to convert EBIT to free cash flow nor its EBIT growth rate gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its interest cover tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. We think that FriendLtd's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with FriendLtd (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .
FriendLtd將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的能力和EBIT增長率並沒有讓我們對其承擔更多債務的能力充滿信心。但其利息覆蓋率則講述了一個非常不同的故事,並暗示出一定的韌性。我們認爲,在考慮上述數據點後,FriendLtd的債務確實讓其變得有些風險。這並不一定是壞事,因爲槓桿可以提升股本回報,但這是需要注意的事項。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個起點。然而,並非所有的投資風險都體現在資產負債表上,遠非如此。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的與FriendLtd相關的2個警告信號(其中1個信號有些令人擔憂)。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。