Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) CEO Huanchang Li, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 6.1% Reduction in Holdings Value
Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) CEO Huanchang Li, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 6.1% Reduction in Holdings Value
Key Insights
关键见解
- Shenzhen Changhong Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- 21% of Shenzhen Changhong Technology is held by Institutions
- 深圳长虹科技拥有大量内部所有权,表明公司扩张有固有的利益
- 共有6位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为52%
- 深圳长虹科技21%的股份由机构持有
A look at the shareholders of Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看深圳长虹科技股份有限公司(SZSE: 300151)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有公司股份最多的集团是内部人士,准确地说是45%左右。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥719m.
结果,在市值下降71900万元人民币之后,内部人士整体遭受了最大的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Changhong Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究深圳长虹科技的每种所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Changhong Technology?
关于深圳长虹科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
We can see that Shenzhen Changhong Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Changhong Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,深圳长虹科技确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看深圳长虹科技过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen Changhong Technology. With a 38% stake, CEO Huanchang Li is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 3.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对深圳长虹科技进行有意义的投资。首席执行官李焕昌持有38%的股份,是最大股东。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约3.6%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有3.3%的所有权。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前六名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Changhong Technology
深圳长虹科技的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥11b, and insiders have CN¥4.9b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有深圳长虹科技有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为110元人民币,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值49元人民币的股票。这非常重要。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in Shenzhen Changhong Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有深圳长虹科技33%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Shenzhen Changhong Technology (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们发现了深圳长虹科技的 2 个警告标志(1 个有点不愉快!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。