share_log

Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) CEO Huanchang Li, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 6.1% Reduction in Holdings Value

Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) CEO Huanchang Li, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 6.1% Reduction in Holdings Value

昌紅科技有限公司(SZSE:300151)首席執行官李環長,公司最大股東持股價值下降6.1%
Simply Wall St ·  11/26 19:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Shenzhen Changhong Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • 21% of Shenzhen Changhong Technology is held by Institutions
  • 昌紅科技內部持股比例較高,表明對公司擴張的內在利益。
  • 總共有6個投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,佔有52%的所有權。
  • 21%的昌紅科技股份被機構持有。

A look at the shareholders of Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看昌紅科技有限公司(深交所代碼:300151)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權力。持有公司最多股份的群體,精確來說,是個體內部人士,大約佔45%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大的利益(或者如果出現下跌,他們將損失最多)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥719m.

因此,內部人士整體上在市值下降後遭受了最高損失,下降幅度爲人民幣71900萬。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Changhong Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解昌紅科技的每一類股東,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SZSE:300151 Ownership Breakdown November 27th 2024
SZSE:300151 股權結構 2024年11月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Changhong Technology?

機構持股對昌紅科技意味着什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Shenzhen Changhong Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Changhong Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到昌紅科技確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但是,我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時候也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,檢查昌紅科技過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:300151 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 27th 2024
深證證券交易所:300151 2024年11月27日的營業收入和盈利增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen Changhong Technology. With a 38% stake, CEO Huanchang Li is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 3.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到對昌紅科技的對沖基金並沒有顯著投資。首席執行官李歡昌持有38%的股份,是最大股東。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約3.6%的流通股,其次是第三大股東持有3.3%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Changhong Technology

昌紅科技的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥11b, and insiders have CN¥4.9b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士在昌紅科技有限公司持有合理的股份比例。它的市值僅爲110億人民幣,內部人士持有價值49億人民幣的股票。這是相當重要的。大多數人會說,這顯示了與股東良好的一致性,特別是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in Shenzhen Changhong Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆,通常是個別投資者,持有昌紅科技33%的股份。雖然這一群體不一定能決定公司的重大事務,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Shenzhen Changhong Technology (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有公司不同集團非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。 例如,我們發現昌紅科技有2個警告信號(其中一個有點不愉快!),在這裏投資前你應該注意這些。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論