Retail Investors Who Hold 37% of LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ:LX) Gained 33%, Insiders Profited as Well
Retail Investors Who Hold 37% of LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ:LX) Gained 33%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要見解
- LexinFintech Holdings' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
- Insiders own 36% of LexinFintech Holdings
- 樂信金融控股的大量零售投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
- 業務的51%由前7名股東持有。
- 內部持有樂信金融控股36%的股份
Every investor in LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ:LX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 37% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
納斯達克股票代碼爲(NASDAQ:LX)的每位樂信金融控股股東都應該注意最強大的股東集團。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地說約佔37%,是零售投資者。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 33% price gain, insiders also received a 36% cut.
儘管零售投資者是上週股價上漲33%後受益最多的群體,但內部人員也獲得了36%的收益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about LexinFintech Holdings.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於樂信科技控股的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LexinFintech Holdings?
機構所有權告訴我們有關樂信科技控股的信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that LexinFintech Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see LexinFintech Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到樂信科技控股確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會有一個風險,即它們在進行一種'擁擠交易'。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下方看到樂信科技控股的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多的。
LexinFintech Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Wenjie Xiao with 24% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.5% and 7.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Yi Wu is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
樂信控股不屬於對沖基金。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是CEO肖文傑,持有24%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.5%和7.3%的流通股份。有趣的是,第三大股東吳毅也是董事會成員,再次表明公司頂級股東中存在着強烈的內部持股。
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更深入的挖掘,發現前7名股東持有大約51%的股份,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of LexinFintech Holdings
樂信控股的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Insiders have a US$199m stake in this US$559m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在樂信金融控股有限公司持有重要股份。內部人士在這家美元55900萬的企業中持有19900萬美元的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是創立該業務的人。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in LexinFintech Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在樂信金融控股有限公司持有37%的股份。儘管這個群體不能確定地決定事務,但它肯定可以對公司的運作產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand LexinFintech Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for LexinFintech Holdings (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解樂信控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了樂信控股的3個警示信號(其中1個不容忽視!)你應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。