Retail Investors Invested in MicroPort Scientific Corporation (HKG:853) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's HK$550m Market Cap Decline
Retail Investors Invested in MicroPort Scientific Corporation (HKG:853) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's HK$550m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over MicroPort Scientific by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- 13% of MicroPort Scientific is held by Institutions
- 零售投資者對微創醫療的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策中有更大的影響力。
- 總共有5位投資者擁有該公司51%的所有權。
- 13%的微創醫療股份由機構持有。
Every investor in MicroPort Scientific Corporation (HKG:853) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 40% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位微創醫療集團(HKG:853)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東團體。持有公司最多股份的團體,約佔40%,是零售投資者。換句話說,這個團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, retail investors as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by HK$550m.
因此,上週零售投資者作爲一個群體承受了最高的損失,因爲市值下降了55000萬港元。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of MicroPort Scientific.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了微創醫療的不同所有權群體。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/809ff/809ff31a2a229642fe762e0a90d1d2a88731071e" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MicroPort Scientific?
機構的所有權告訴我們關於微創醫療什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that MicroPort Scientific does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of MicroPort Scientific, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到微創醫療確實有機構投資者,他們持有相當一部分公司的股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票,並且他們喜歡它。 但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售一隻股票,股票價格大幅下跌並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下微創醫療過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9238f/9238fd792b5bf2658a1cd3e670679ec70447523c" alt="big"
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in MicroPort Scientific. Our data shows that Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 7.9% of the stock.
我們注意到對微創醫療的對沖基金沒有明顯投資。我們的數據表明,大塚控股株式會社是最大的股東,持有21%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約14%和7.9%的股票。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of MicroPort Scientific
微創醫療的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of MicroPort Scientific Corporation. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$38m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有微創醫療公司不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們沒有發現的公司結構間接持有股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值3800萬港元的股票。絕對值可能比比例股份更重要。看到董事會成員持有股票是好的,但可能值得查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
私募股權公司在First Bank持有14%的股份。這意味着他們可以在關鍵政策決策上發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時會成爲追責管理的激進派。但其他時候,私募股權則是出售股份,將公司公開上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 25%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的25%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人士可能是通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是以個人的身份,而對某家上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但這值得作爲進一步研究的一個領域來注意。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 21% of the MicroPort Scientific shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有微創醫療21%的流通股份。這可能是出於戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的業務關係。它們可能已經分拆。這一持股情況可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for MicroPort Scientific you should know about.
我發現了解一個公司的具體擁有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得深刻的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現微創醫療有2個您應該了解的警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。