Shenzhen IN-Cube Automation Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301312) Insiders, Who Hold 68% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback
Shenzhen IN-Cube Automation Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301312) Insiders, Who Hold 68% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 內部人士似乎對深圳iN-Cube Automation的增長有既得利益,因爲他們的持股規模很大。
- 共有2位投資者持有55%的大多數股份
- 公司的過往表現以及所有權數據有助於強烈判斷業務的前景
If you want to know who really controls Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301312), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 68% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制深圳iN-Cube Automation有限公司(SZSE:301312),你需要查看其股份登記的構成。個別內部人士持有68%的股份,擁有公司最多的股票。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最多的利益(或者在市場 downturn 時損失最多)。
As market cap fell to CN¥4.1b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
由於市值上週降至41億人民幣,內部人士面臨的損失將比公司其他任何股東群體都要高。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討深圳iN-Cube自動化的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d4b4/0d4b4b20aac9ffdf0e19dfd1f8b85b404d611c5a" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation?
機構持股告訴我們關於深圳iN-Cube自動化什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到深圳iN-Cube自動化確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當大一部分。這在專業投資者中暗示了某種可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看深圳iN-Cube自動化過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e6a6/4e6a6f5827d7b8c48c21bbf948c31c5febac7ea0" alt="big"
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation. Peng Qiu is currently the largest shareholder, with 32% of shares outstanding. With 23% and 9.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wei Guan and Jianfeng Huang are the second and third largest shareholders. Two of the top three shareholders happen to be Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. That is, insiders feature higher up in the heirarchy of the company's top shareholders.
我們注意到對深圳iN-Cube Automation進行投資的對沖基金並不多。彭秋目前是最大的股東,持有32%的流通股。魏涓和黃劍鋒分別持有23%和9.9%的流通股,位列第二和第三大股東。三大股東中的兩位恰好是首席執行官和董事會成員。也就是說,內部人士在公司股東結構的層級中佔據了更高的位置。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前兩大股東通過其55%的股份在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構持股情況是評估和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師情緒也能達到同樣的效果。我們的信息顯示該股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,因此可能不爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation
深圳iN-Cube Automation的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥2.8b worth of shares in the CN¥4.1b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來,深圳iN-Cube自動化有限公司的內部人士持有超過一半的股票。這使他們擁有很大的權力。這意味着他們在這家市值41億的公司中擁有價值28億人民幣的股份。這是相當有意義的。大多數人會認爲這是一種積極的表現,表明與股東之間的高度一致。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
大衆一般爲散戶投資者,持有深圳iN-Cube自動化公司的20%股份。儘管這種持股比例可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 3.7%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營公司擁有3.7%的流通股份。這可能值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,例如內部人士,對這些私營公司有興趣,那應該在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Shenzhen iN-Cube Automation is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit unpleasant...
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解深圳iN-Cube自動化,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,深圳iN-Cube自動化顯示出4個警告信號,其中1個比較不愉快……
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。