Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600993) Largest Shareholders Are Individual Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged CN¥664m Last Week
Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600993) Largest Shareholders Are Individual Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged CN¥664m Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Institutions own 21% of Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group
- 个别投资者对马应龙药品集团的重大控制权意味着公众在管理和治理相关决策方面拥有更大的影响力。
- 共有14名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,占有50%的所有权。
- 机构拥有马应龙药品集团21%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600993) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看马应龙药品集团有限公司(SHSE:600993)的股东情况可以告诉我们哪个集团最具权力。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有43%股份的个别投资者。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下行风险)。
Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥664m last week.
显然,在公司市值上周增长了66400万人民币后,散户投资者受益最多。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解马应龙药品集团的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group?
机构所有权对马应龙药品集团的启示是什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所见,机构投资者在马应龙药品集团中拥有相当的股份。这在一定程度上表明了专业投资者的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误投资,就像其他人一样。如果同时有两个大型机构投资者试图出售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得查看马应龙药品集团过去的盈利轨迹(见下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is China Baoan Group Co., Ltd. with 29% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.2% and 4.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
马应龙并不被对冲基金持有。 根据我们的数据,最大股东是中国宝安集团有限公司,持有29%的流通股份。 与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有5.2%和4.4%的流通股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前14名股东合计持有该公司的50%股权,表明没有单一股东对该公司有重大控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。
Insider Ownership Of Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group
马应龙的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
看起来,私营企业拥有安徽皖能电力股票的58%。这值得深入挖掘。如果相关方,如内部人士,在其中一家私营企业中拥有利益,那么应该在年度报告中披露。私人企业也可能对公司有战略利益。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
广大公众--包括散户投资者--持有该公司的43%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然此群体不一定能左右大局,但它肯定会对公司如何运营产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.1%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私营企业持有公司6.1%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得进一步了解这些私营公司的所有者。有时,内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司对一家上市公司股份有兴趣。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 29% of the Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我们可以看到公共公司持有29%的马应龙股份。这很难确定,但这表明他们有交织的业务利益。这可能是一个战略性股份,因此值得关注这一领域的所有权变更。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Mayinglong Pharmaceutical Group .
我发现研究一个公司究竟由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该注意到我们发现的与马应龙相关的1个警告信号。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。