Is Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s (NYSE:LVS) ROE Of 50% Impressive?
Is Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s (NYSE:LVS) ROE Of 50% Impressive?
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Las Vegas Sands Corp. (NYSE:LVS).
我們能做的最好的投資之一是我們自己的知識和技能。考慮到這一點,本文將探討如何使用股本回報率(ROE)來更好地了解業務。爲了使課程以實用爲基礎,我們將使用投資回報率來更好地了解拉斯維加斯金沙集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:LVS)。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
投資回報率或股本回報率是評估公司如何有效地從股東那裏獲得投資回報的有用工具。簡而言之,它衡量公司相對於股東權益的盈利能力。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
你如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for return on equity is:
股本回報率的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Las Vegas Sands is:
因此,根據上述公式,拉斯維加斯金沙的投資回報率爲:
50% = US$1.8b ÷ US$3.6b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
50% = 18億美元 ÷ 36億美元(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.50 in profit.
「回報」 是過去十二個月的稅後收入。對此進行概念化的一種方法是,該公司每擁有1美元的股東資本,就能獲得0.50美元的利潤。
Does Las Vegas Sands Have A Good ROE?
拉斯維加斯金沙有不錯的投資回報率嗎?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. Pleasingly, Las Vegas Sands has a superior ROE than the average (12%) in the Hospitality industry.
確定公司股本回報率是否不錯的一種簡單方法是將其與該行業的平均水平進行比較。重要的是,這遠非一個完美的衡量標準,因爲各公司在相同的行業分類中差異很大。令人高興的是,拉斯維加斯金沙的投資回報率高於酒店業的平均水平(12%)。
That's clearly a positive. With that said, a high ROE doesn't always indicate high profitability. Aside from changes in net income, a high ROE can also be the outcome of high debt relative to equity, which indicates risk. Our risks dashboardshould have the 3 risks we have identified for Las Vegas Sands.
這顯然是積極的。話雖如此,高投資回報率並不總是表示高盈利能力。除了淨收入的變化外,較高的投資回報率也可能是高債務相對於股本的結果,這表明存在風險。我們的風險儀表板應包含我們爲拉斯維加斯金沙集團確定的三種風險。
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
債務對股本回報率的重要性
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
大多數公司需要來自某個地方的資金來增加利潤。這些現金可以來自發行股票、留存收益或債務。在第一和第二種情況下,投資回報率將反映現金用於企業投資的這種用途。在後一種情況下,債務的使用將提高回報,但不會改變股權。這將使投資回報率看起來比不使用債務時更好。
Combining Las Vegas Sands' Debt And Its 50% Return On Equity
合併拉斯維加斯金沙的債務及其50%的股本回報率
We think Las Vegas Sands uses a significant amount of debt to maximize its returns, as it has a significantly higher debt to equity ratio of 3.81. While its ROE is no doubt quite impressive, it could give a false impression about the company's returns given that its huge debt could be boosting those returns.
我們認爲,拉斯維加斯金沙集團使用大量債務來實現回報最大化,因爲其負債權益比率要高得多,爲3.81。儘管其投資回報率無疑相當可觀,但鑑於其巨額債務可能會提高這些回報,它可能會給公司的回報留下錯誤的印象。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股本回報率是衡量企業創造利潤並將其返還給股東的能力的有用指標。在我們的賬簿中,儘管債務很低,但質量最高的公司的股本回報率卻很高。如果兩家公司的投資回報率相同,那麼我通常更喜歡負債較少的公司。
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
話雖如此,儘管投資回報率是衡量業務質量的有用指標,但您必須考慮一系列因素才能確定購買股票的正確價格。相對於當前價格所反映的利潤增長預期,還必須考慮利潤可能的增長速度。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於分析師對公司的預測的免費報告。
Of course Las Vegas Sands may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.
當然,拉斯維加斯金沙可能不是最好的買入股票。因此,您不妨免費查看其他投資回報率高、負債率低的公司的名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。