The Recent 7.2% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Ruiqiang Li's Week, Novogene Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688315) Most Bullish Insider
The Recent 7.2% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Ruiqiang Li's Week, Novogene Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688315) Most Bullish Insider
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Novogene implies vested interests in company growth
- 53% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Ruiqiang Li)
- Institutional ownership in Novogene is 16%
- 对Novogene的重要内部控制意味着对公司增长的利益关联
- 公司的53%股份由单一股东(李瑞强)持有
- Novogene的机构持股比例为16%
A look at the shareholders of Novogene Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688315) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下Novogene Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688315) 的股东,就可以了解哪一群体最强大。我们可以看到个别内部人拥有公司53%的所有权。换句话说,该群体在投资该公司方面获得最多(或失去最多)的利益。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥5.6b market cap following a 7.2% gain in the stock.
作为结果,内部人员上周得分最高,因为公司股价上涨7.2%,市值达到56亿人民币。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Novogene.
在下面的图表中,我们会重点关注诺禾基因的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Novogene?
机构持股告诉我们关于诺禾基因的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Novogene does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Novogene, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到诺禾基因确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的很大一部分股票。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖于随机出现的机构投资者所带来的验证。他们也有时会出错。如果两家大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一家股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查诺禾基因的过去收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Novogene is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Ruiqiang Li with 53% of shares outstanding. This implies that they possess majority interests and have significant control over the company. Investors usually consider it a good sign when the company leadership has such a significant stake, as this is widely perceived to increase the chance that the management will act in the best interests of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 4.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
Novogene不是由对冲基金所有。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是CEO李睿强,持有53%的股份。这意味着他们拥有多数权益,并对公司拥有重要的控制权。投资者通常认为,当公司领导层拥有如此大比例的股份时,这是一个良好的迹象,因为普遍认为这将增加管理层为公司利益而采取行动的机会。与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的12%和4.5%。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Novogene
Novogene的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Novogene Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own CN¥3.0b worth of shares in the CN¥5.6b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人员拥有Novogene Co.,Ltd.的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做决定。这意味着他们在这家56亿人民币公司中拥有30亿人民币的股份。这相当有意义。看到这种程度的投资是件好事。您可以在这里检查一下,看看这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Novogene. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众拥有17%的股份,其中大部分是个人投资者,对Novogene有一定程度的影响力。尽管这一所有权规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 15%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们可以看到,私营企业拥有发行股票的15%。私营企业可能是相关方。有时,内部人通过持有私人公司的股份而不是以个人身份拥有对公开公司的利益。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但作为进一步研究的领域值得注意。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。