Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 12% Last Week
Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 12% Last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Graphjet Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Graphjet Technology的重大内部所有权表明了公司扩张的固有利益
- 57% 的业务由前三名股东持有
- 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会
A look at the shareholders of Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ:GTI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Graphjet Technology(纳斯达克股票代码:GTI)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。个人内部人士拥有54%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$370m market cap following a 12% gain in the stock.
结果,内部人士上周得分最高,该公司的市值在股价上涨12%后达到3.7亿美元。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Graphjet Technology.
在下图中,我们放大了Graphjet科技的不同所有权组。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Graphjet Technology?
关于Graphjet技术,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
交易不太活跃的小公司通常缺少机构投资者,但是没有机构投资者的大公司并不常见。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Graphjet Technology's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
没有机构拥有公司股份的原因可能多种多样。通常,小型的新上市公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在公司中建立有意义的地位。或者,该公司的某些方面可能使机构投资者望而却步。Graphjet Technology的收益和收入记录(见下文)可能不会吸引机构投资者,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究该业务。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Graphjet Technology. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Graphjet Technology's case, its Chief Scientific Officer, Yun Liu, is the largest shareholder, holding 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 19% and 14%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Hooi Lim is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Ping Wei Lee directly holds 6.0% of the total shares outstanding.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Graphjet科技进行有意义的投资。因为行动胜于雄辩,所以我们认为当内部人士拥有公司的大量股份时,这是一个好兆头。就Graphjet Technology而言,其首席科学官刘云是最大股东,持有25%的已发行股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的19%和14%。有趣的是,第三大股东Hooi Lim也是董事会主席,这再次表明该公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。此外,该公司首席执行官李平伟直接持有已发行股份总额的6.0%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前三名股东通过其57%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。
Insider Ownership Of Graphjet Technology
Graphjet 技术的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Graphjet Technology. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$199m stake in this US$370m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有Graphjet科技一半以上的股份。这使他们能够有效控制公司。因此,他们在这笔3.7亿美元的业务中拥有199亿美元的股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Graphjet Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有Graphjet Technology28%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 19%, of the Graphjet Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
看来私营公司拥有Graphjet Technology19%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Graphjet Technology has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例-Graphjet Technology 有 4 个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。