Does Teradata (NYSE:TDC) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Teradata (NYSE:TDC) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Teradata Corporation (NYSE:TDC) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
由巴菲特的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李某,毫不掩飾地表示,'最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受資本的永久損失。' 在審視一家公司風險時,考慮公司的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲在企業倒閉時往往會涉及到債務。 和許多其他公司一樣,Teradata Corporation (紐交所:TDC) 也在使用債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使公司變得風險更大。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
一般來說,債務只有在公司無法通過籌資或自身的現金流輕鬆償還時才會成爲一個真正的問題。如果情況真的變得非常糟糕,貸方可以控制這家企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司只爲了控制債務,必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司能夠合理地管理債務,以獲得自身的優勢。在考慮公司的債務水平時,第一步是考慮現金和債務的結合。
What Is Teradata's Net Debt?
Teradata的淨債務是多少?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Teradata had US$486.0m in debt in September 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it also had US$348.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$138.0m.
下面的圖表,您可以點擊以獲取更詳細的信息,顯示Teradata在2024年9月債務爲48600萬美元;與前一年大致相同。然而,它還有34800萬美元的現金,因此它的淨債務爲13800萬美元。
How Healthy Is Teradata's Balance Sheet?
Teradata的資產負債表健康狀況如何?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Teradata had liabilities of US$875.0m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$659.0m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$348.0m and US$253.0m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$933.0m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
通過查看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到Teradata有87500萬美元的負債在12個月內到期,以及65900萬美元的負債在之後到期。另一方面,它有34800萬美元的現金和25300萬美元的應收賬款在一年內到期。因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款總和多93300萬美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Teradata has a market capitalization of US$3.03b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
雖然這看起來很多,但並沒有那麼糟糕,因爲Teradata的市值爲30.3億美元,因此如果需要的話,應該能夠通過融資來增強其資產負債表。但我們肯定要留意債務帶來的過大風險的跡象。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們使用兩個主要比率來了解相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是它的息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出的次數(或者簡稱爲利息覆蓋率)。這樣,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
Teradata has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.44. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 11.8 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On top of that, Teradata grew its EBIT by 48% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Teradata can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Teradata的淨債務與EBITDA比率僅爲0.44而且其EBIT覆蓋利息支出達到了驚人的11.8倍。因此可以說,其債務對它的威脅程度不比大象對老鼠的威脅大。此外,Teradata在過去十二個月中將EBIT增長了48%,這種增長將使其更容易處理債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個好的起點。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定Teradata是否能夠隨着時間的推移增強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想了解專業人士的看法,可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, Teradata actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last three years. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.
最後,雖然稅務機關可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受現金。因此,值得檢查那部分EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的。令人高興的是,在過去三年中,Teradata實際上產生的自由現金流超過了EBIT。這種強勁的現金轉化率讓我們與人群在Daft Punk演唱會開始時一樣興奮。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Teradata's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its EBIT growth rate also supports that impression! Overall, we don't think Teradata is taking any bad risks, as its debt load seems modest. So we're not worried about the use of a little leverage on the balance sheet. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Teradata you should know about.
令人高興的是,Teradata在EBIT到自由現金流的驚人轉化表明它在債務上佔據優勢。而好消息並沒有止步於此,因爲它的EBIT增長率也支持了這一印象!總體來說,我們認爲Teradata並沒有承受任何壞風險,因爲它的債務負擔似乎適中。因此,我們對在資產負債表上稍微使用槓桿並不擔心。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表以外的風險。這些風險可能很難察覺。每個公司都有這些風險,而我們發現了Teradata需要注意的2個警告信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。你可以訪問我們的特別公司列表(所有公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。