Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688071) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Yin Li, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 39% Last Week
Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688071) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Yin Li, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 39% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- 52% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- 12% of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd is held by Institutions
- 对上海W-Ibeda高科技集团有限公司的显著内部控制意味着对公司增长的既得利益
- 前六大股东持有该业务的52%。
- 12%的上海W-Ibeda高科技集团有限公司由机构持有
Every investor in Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688071) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位投资者在上海W-Ibeda高科技集团有限公司(SHSE:688071)都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,个别内部人士在公司中拥有最大的股份,持有49%的股份。也就是说,该集团将在股票上涨时获益最多(或者在下跌时损失最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥2.8b market cap following a 39% gain in the stock.
因此,上周内部人士获得了最高评分,因为公司在股票上涨39%后市值达到了28亿人民币。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd.
让我们更详细地了解一下不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于上海维贝达高科技集团有限公司的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd?
机构所有权能告诉我们关于上海维贝达高科技集团有限公司什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所见,机构投资者在上海维贝达高科技集团有限公司中拥有相当的股份。这表明专业投资者对于该公司的信任。但是,我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像所有人一样。如果多家机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,股票价格可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面上海维贝达高科技集团有限公司的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Yin Li is the largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
上海维贝达高科技集团有限公司不被对冲基金持有。公司的首席执行官尹莉是最大的股东,持有21%的流通股份。对于背景来说,第二大股东持有约9.3%的流通股份,第三大股东的持股比例为6.5%。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前6大股东持有超过一半的股份登记簿,有一些较小的股东来平衡较大股东的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd
上海维贝达高科技集团有限公司的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.Group Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.8b, and insiders have CN¥1.4b worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在上海维贝达高科技集团有限公司持有大量股份。它的市值仅为28亿人民币,内部人士名下有价值14亿人民币的股票。这可能意味着创始人仍然拥有很多股票。您可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
总体来说,包括零售投资者在内的大众拥有公司的37%股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以在他们的任何决策中左右政策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shanghai W-Ibeda High Tech.GroupLtd .
我发现查看公司到底是谁拥有的非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该注意到我们发现的 上海W-Ibeda高科技集团有限公司 的 2个警告信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。