Goertek Inc.'s (SZSE:002241) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 54% Stake, While 17% Is Held by Insiders
Goertek Inc.'s (SZSE:002241) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 54% Stake, While 17% Is Held by Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Goertek by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 17% of Goertek is held by insiders
- 个别投资者对国光的重大控制意味着公众对管理和治理相关决策有更多影响力。
- 前25名股东持有43%的业务。
- 17%的国光股份由内部人士持有。
Every investor in Goertek Inc. (SZSE:002241) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位在国光股份有限公司(SZSE:002241)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,个别投资者拥有该公司54%的股份,换句话说,该群体从他们对公司的投资中获得的收益(或损失)最大。
Individual insiders, on the other hand, account for 17% of the company's stockholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.
另一方面,内部人士占公司股东的17%。一般来说,随着公司的发展,机构会增加他们的持股比例。相反,内部人士通常会随着时间的推移减少他们的持股。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Goertek.
让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于歌尔科技的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Goertek?
机构持股对我们了解歌尔科技的意义是什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Goertek already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Goertek's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
歌尔科技的股东名册中已经有机构参与。确实,他们在公司的持股比例相当可观。这在一定程度上表明了专业投资者的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时对某只股票的看法发生变化,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,有必要看看下面歌尔科技的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Goertek is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Goertek Group Company Limited with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
歌尔股份并不被对冲基金持有。根据我们的数据显示,最大的股东是歌尔集团有限公司,持有15%的流通股份。为了提供背景,第二大股东持有约8.4%的流通股份,第三大股东则持有7.3%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Goertek
歌尔的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Goertek Inc.. Insiders own CN¥14b worth of shares in the CN¥86b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部联系人拥有合理比例的歌尔股份有限公司股份。内部联系人持有价值140亿元人民币的股份,而该公司价值860亿元人民币。这是相当重要的。大多数人会说,这表明与股东有良好的一致性,尤其是在这样规模的公司中。您可以点击这里查看这些内部联系人是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of Goertek. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
公众,包括零售投资者,持有54%的歌尔股份。这种规模的所有权赋予公众投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以并可能会影响高管薪酬、股息政策和拟议的业务收购的决定。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 15%, of the Goertek stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎有15%的高德克股票被私人公司持有。单凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得调查一下这些私人公司的股东。有时,内部人员或其他相关方通过一家独立的私人公司持有一家上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Goertek you should be aware of.
我觉得了解一家公司究竟由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获得深入的见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。举个例子:我们发现了1个关于高德克的警示信号,你应该知道。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。