Emergent BioSolutions Inc.'s (NYSE:EBS) Institutional Investors Lost 11% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Emergent BioSolutions Inc.'s (NYSE:EBS) Institutional Investors Lost 11% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Emergent BioSolutions implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构对emergent biosolutions的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响。
- 前25名股东持有48%的业务。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (NYSE:EBS) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看emergent biosolutions Inc. (纽交所:EBS)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。我们可以看到机构在公司中拥有59%的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将获得最大的利益(或者在出现下跌时损失最大)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$488m last week. Still, the 262% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
机构投资者在上周公司市值降至48800万美元后受到的影响最大。不过,262%的年涨幅可能帮助减轻了他们的整体损失。我们假设,他们未来会关注潜在的疲软迹象。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Emergent BioSolutions, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地研究一下emergent biosolutions的每种所有者类型,首先是下面的图表。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emergent BioSolutions?
机构所有权对我们了解emergent biosolutions有什么帮助?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Emergent BioSolutions already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Emergent BioSolutions' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
emergent biosolutions已经在股份登记中有机构投资者。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这在专业投资者中暗示了一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依赖这一点,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于"拥挤交易"的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个参与方可能会争相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以看到emergent biosolutions的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的故事。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Emergent BioSolutions. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 6.3% of shares outstanding. Marshall Wace LLP is the second largest shareholder owning 4.6% of common stock, and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. holds about 4.1% of the company stock.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对冲基金在emergent biosolutions的股份不多。先锋集团目前是该公司的最大股东,持有6.3%的流通股。Marshall Wace LLP是第二大股东,持有4.6%的普通股,嘉信理财投资管理公司持有大约4.1%的公司股票。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。
Insider Ownership Of Emergent BioSolutions
emergent biosolutions的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Emergent BioSolutions Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$9.1m worth of stock in the US$488m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们可以报告,内部人确实持有 emergent biosolutions Inc. 的股票。内部人以自己名义持有价值910万美元的股票,而该公司的总市值为48800万美元。看到内部人有所投资是好事,但检查这些内部人是否在买入股票可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 39% stake in Emergent BioSolutions. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
大众公众,通常是个人投资者,持有 emergent biosolutions 39%的股份。虽然这种持股规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Emergent BioSolutions , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是很重要的,但还有其他因素更为重要。 例如,投资风险始终存在。 我们已经确立了与emergent biosolutions相关的3个警告信号,理解这些信号应该是你投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。