Positive Week for Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE:RBRK) Institutional Investors Who Control 34% of the Company
Positive Week for Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE:RBRK) Institutional Investors Who Control 34% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Rubrik implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 机构在Rubrik的重大持股意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响
- 共有6名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有50%的所有权。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE:RBRK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 34% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制Rubrik,Inc. (纽交所:RBRK),那么你需要查看其股份登记的组成。持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占34%,是机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
Clearly, institutional investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$2.5b last week.
显然,机构投资者在公司市值上周上涨25亿美元后受益最多。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Rubrik.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Rubrik的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rubrik?
机构持股告诉我们有关 Rubrik 的什么事情?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Rubrik already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Rubrik's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Rubrik已经在股份登记中有机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果多个机构同时对某只股票改变看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得查看Rubrik的盈利历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Rubrik. Our data shows that Lightspeed Ventures, LLC is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 6.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Bipul Sinha, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
我们注意到对Rubrik并没有显著的对冲基金投资。我们的数据表明,Lightspeed Ventures, LLC是最大的股东,持有17%的在外流通股票。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有11%和6.8%的在外流通股票。第三大股东Bipul Sinha同时担任董事会主席的职务。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前6大股东持有超过一半的股份登记簿,有一些较小的股东来平衡较大股东的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Rubrik
Rubrik的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Rubrik, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$12b, and insiders have US$2.4b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我们的信息表明,内部人士在Rubrik, Inc.中保持着显著的持有。其市值仅为120亿美元,内部人士名下持有价值24亿美元的股票。这相当可观。大多数人会高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望查看这张显示内部人士最近交易的免费图表。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
我觉得看看谁拥有公司很有趣。但是,要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,风险 - 江苏泽宇智能动力股份有限公司有2个警告标志(1个非常重要),我们认为您应该知道。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 28% stake in Rubrik. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股权投资公司持有Rubrik 28%的股份。这表明他们在关键政策决策中可能具有影响力。有时我们看到股权投资会长期关注,但一般来说,他们的投资时间较短,正如其名字所示,他们不太会投资于公共公司。在一段时间后,他们可能会寻求卖出并在其他地方重新投资资本。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Rubrik (including 1 which is concerning) .
虽然考虑不同的拥有公司群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。因此,你应该了解我们发现的Rubrik的三个警示信号(包括一个令人担忧的信号)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。