share_log

Donaldson Company, Inc.'s (NYSE:DCI) Institutional Investors Lost 6.6% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

Donaldson Company, Inc.'s (NYSE:DCI) Institutional Investors Lost 6.6% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

唐納森公司(紐交所代碼:DCI)的機構投資者在過去一週損失了6.6%,但從長期收益中獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  12/09 20:20

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Donaldson Company's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着唐納森公司的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感
  • 前15大股東持有公司50%的股份
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Donaldson Company, Inc. (NYSE:DCI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了唐納森公司(紐交所:DCI),理解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。持有最大份額的群體是機構,擁有86%的股份。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或遭受最大損失)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$645m last week. However, the 18% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

機構投資者在公司市值上週下降了64500萬美元后遭受了最高損失。然而,股東在過去一年18%的回報可能減輕了損失的影響。儘管如此,他們仍應注意未來可能的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Donaldson Company.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注唐納森公司的不同股權結構。

big
NYSE:DCI Ownership Breakdown December 9th 2024
紐交所:DCI 股東結構 2024年12月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Donaldson Company?

機構持有對我們了解唐納森公司有什麼啓示?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

Donaldson Company already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Donaldson Company's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

唐納森公司已經在股票登記上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡這種股票。但是和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。多家機構共同持有一隻股票時,總是存在「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭迅速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到唐納森公司的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多的內容。

big
NYSE:DCI Earnings and Revenue Growth December 9th 2024
紐交所:唐納森公司2024年12月9日的盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Donaldson Company. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.0% and 7.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能必須關注他們的偏好。 對沖基金在唐納森公司沒有很多股份。 先鋒集團是目前公司最大的股東,持有11%的流通股份。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有9.0%和7.8%的流通股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的股權數據的仔細觀察表明,前15大股東的合計持股比例爲50%,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Donaldson Company

唐納森公司的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終是包括在內的。管理層最終對董事會負責。不過,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that Donaldson Company, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$50m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,唐納森公司內部人士持有公司不到1%的股份。由於公司規模龐大,我們不期望內部人士持有大量股票。總的來說,他們擁有5000萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,觀察內部人士是否在買入或賣出會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有公司14%的股份,因此無法輕易忽視。儘管這種股份的規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Donaldson Company has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮不同的股東對公司的擁有情況非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。 例如,風險 - 唐納森公司有 1 個警示信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你和我一樣,可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是會縮減。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論