Individual Investors Among Winall Hi-tech Seed Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300087) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 8.4% Price Drop
Individual Investors Among Winall Hi-tech Seed Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300087) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 8.4% Price Drop
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Winall Hi-tech Seed indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 47% ownership
- Insider ownership in Winall Hi-tech Seed is 14%
- 個人投資者在荃銀高科中的大量持有表明,他們在管理和業務策略方面擁有更大的發言權。
- 共有25位投資者在公司中擁有47%的控股權。
- 荃銀高科的內部持股比例爲14%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Winall Hi-tech Seed Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300087), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着荃銀高科(SZSE:300087),了解公司的所有權結構是非常重要的。我們可以看到,個人投資者在公司中擁有53%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大的收益(或者在下跌時損失最大)。
And following last week's 8.4% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.
在上週股價下跌8.4%之後,散戶投資者遭受了最大損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Winall Hi-tech Seed, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解荃銀高科的各類股東,首先請看下面的圖表。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/767f8/767f8dc0639cd9e765be9fd9bdf7794ea8a08d1b" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Winall Hi-tech Seed?
機構持股對我們了解荃銀高科有什麼啓示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Winall Hi-tech Seed does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Winall Hi-tech Seed's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到荃銀高科確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一點,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,和所有人一樣。如果多個機構同時對某隻股票的看法改變,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,查看荃銀高科的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是最重要的。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ad0f/3ad0f0a3dedd35763951f22adf69fdf7b233d837" alt="big"
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Winall Hi-tech Seed. Sinochem Holdings Corporation Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. With 6.9% and 4.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Guilan Jia and Qin Zhang are the second and third largest shareholders. Qin Zhang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Vice Chairman.
我們注意到對荃銀高科的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。 中國化工控股有限公司目前是最大的股東,持有21%的流通股份。 而賈貴蘭和張秦則分別持有6.9%和4.8%的流通股份,位列第二和第三大股東。 第三大股東張秦也恰好擔任副董事長。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。覆蓋該股票的分析師數量相對合理,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Winall Hi-tech Seed
荃銀高科的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然對內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Winall Hi-tech Seed Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.5b worth of shares in the CN¥10b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看來內部人士擁有荃銀高科股份有限公司相當大比例的股份。內部人士持有價值15億人民幣的股份,而公司總市值爲100億人民幣。這相當有意義。大多數人會認爲這顯示出與股東之間良好的協調關係,尤其在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 53% of Winall Hi-tech Seed shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
公衆普遍,由個體投資者構成,總共持有53%的荃銀高科股票。這種持股水平使得公衆投資者在如董事會組成、執行薪酬和股息支付比例等關鍵政策決策中具備一定的影響力。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 21%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私營公司持有21%的發行股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得進一步了解哪些人擁有這些私營公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過一家單獨的私營公司對一家上市公司的股份有興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Winall Hi-tech Seed (including 2 which are a bit unpleasant) .
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。爲此,你應該了解我們與荃銀高科發現的4個警告信號(包括2個比較令人不快的)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。