CureVac N.V.'s (NASDAQ:CVAC) Largest Shareholders Are Individual Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$101m Last Week
CureVac N.V.'s (NASDAQ:CVAC) Largest Shareholders Are Individual Investors Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$101m Last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over CureVac by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 3 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Institutions own 18% of CureVac
- 个人投资者对CureVac的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
- 前三名股东拥有公司52%的股份
- 机构拥有 CureVac 18% 的股份
If you want to know who really controls CureVac N.V. (NASDAQ:CVAC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了CureVac N.V.(纳斯达克股票代码:CVAC),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为37%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
As a result, individual investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 15% gain.
因此,个人投资者是上周15%涨幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CureVac.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于CureVac的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CureVac?
关于CureVac,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据接近当地市场的指数来衡量其表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CureVac. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CureVac's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所见,机构投资者在CureVac中拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看CureVac的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
CureVac is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is dievini Hopp BioTech holding GmbH & Co. KG, with ownership of 31%. With 13% and 7.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, KfW, Asset Management Arm and GSK plc are the second and third largest shareholders.
CureVac不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是 dievini Hopp Biotech Holding GmbH & Co.KG,所有权为31%。德国复兴信贷银行、资产管理部门和葛兰素史克公司分别占已发行股份的13%和7.4%,是第二和第三大股东。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,3名最大股东通过其52%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。有合理数量的分析师报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of CureVac
CureVac 的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
尽管内部人员的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东的关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
We can see that insiders own shares in CureVac N.V.. It has a market capitalization of just US$695m, and insiders have US$43m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以看到内部人士拥有CureVac N.V的股份。它的市值仅为6.95亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值4300万美元的股票。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in CureVac. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有CureVac37%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股权所有权
Private equity firms hold a 31% stake in CureVac. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股权公司持有CureVac31%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。一些投资者可能会为此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能会在投资上市后退出投资。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 7.4% of the CureVac shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我们可以看到,上市公司持有CureVac已发行股票的7.4%。我们无法确定,但这很可能是一个战略利益。这些企业可能相似,也可以合作。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for CureVac you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了一个你应该注意的CureVac警告信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。