OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688308) 12% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 35% as Well as Insiders
OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688308) 12% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 35% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over OKE Precision Cutting Tools by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
- Insider ownership in OKE Precision Cutting Tools is 25%
- 零售投資者對歐科億的重大控制意味着公衆在影響管理和治理相關決策方面擁有更大的權力。
- 51%的業務由前7大股東持有
- 歐科億的內部持股爲25%。
If you want to know who really controls OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688308), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 35% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制了歐科億(SHSE:688308),那麼你必須查看其股份登記的組成。我們可以看到,散戶投資者在該公司的股權中擁有35%的控股權。換句話說,這個群體將從對公司的投資中獲得最多的收益(或承擔最多的損失)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 12% price gain, insiders also received a 25% cut.
雖然散戶投資者是上週價格上漲12%後獲得最大收益的群體,但內部人士也獲得了25%的收益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of OKE Precision Cutting Tools, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解一下歐科億的每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OKE Precision Cutting Tools?
機構所有權告訴我們關於歐科億什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in OKE Precision Cutting Tools. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see OKE Precision Cutting Tools' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所見,機構投資者在歐科億的股份相當可觀。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好還是謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。它們有時也會出錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。在沒有歷史增長的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到歐科億的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的故事。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in OKE Precision Cutting Tools. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Meihe Yuan with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.1% of the stock. Wenqing Tan, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
對沖基金在歐科億的持股不多。查看我們的數據,可以看到最大的股東是梅合源,持有16%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約10%和9.1%的股票。第三大股東譚文清恰好也是董事會成員。
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步調查發現,前七大股東佔註冊股東的大約51%,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of OKE Precision Cutting Tools
歐科億的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in OKE Precision Cutting Tools Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥885m worth of shares in the CN¥3.5b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在歐科億精密切削工具有限公司擁有重要的持股。內部人士持有價值88500萬人民幣的股份,而該公司市值爲35億人民幣。這可能表明創始人仍然持有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over OKE Precision Cutting Tools. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有35%股份的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對歐科億精密切削工具有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體並不一定能決定最終決策,但肯定能夠對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 6.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
持有6.0%的股權,股權投資公司有機會參與塑造企業策略,重點關注價值創造。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時能夠推動有助於市場認識到公司價值的策略。另一方面,這些持有者可能在公司上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 3.9%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營公司擁有3.9%的發行股份。值得進一步深入了解。如果相關方,如內部人士,對其中一家公司有利益關係,這應該在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 10% of OKE Precision Cutting Tools stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
目前,上市公司擁有10%的歐科億股票。很難確定,但這表明它們之間存在緊密的業務利益。這可能是一個戰略性股份,因此值得關注所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for OKE Precision Cutting Tools (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.
我發現查看具體擁有某公司的股東非常有趣。但是爲了真正獲得深刻的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 比如風險,每家公司都有風險,我們發現歐科億有3個警告信號(其中1個有點不愉快!)你應該了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。