Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as RxSight, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RXST) Recent US$258m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as RxSight, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RXST) Recent US$258m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies RxSight's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 顯著高的機構持有量意味着RxSight的股票價格對其交易行爲敏感。
- 共有17位投資者在該公司擁有51%的控股權。
- 內部人士最近一直在買入
Every investor in RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXST) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每個在RxSight, Inc. (納斯達克:RXST)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔75%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 15% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 10% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell RxSight, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
上週,機構投資者的持有價值下降了15%。這一組投資者可能特別關注當前的損失,這使得股東的年度損失增加到了10%。機構或稱爲「流動性提供者」的投資者控制着大量資金,因此,這類投資者通常對股票價格的波動具有很大的影響力。因此,如果下行趨勢持續,機構可能會面臨賣出RxSight的壓力,這可能對個人投資者產生負面影響。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RxSight.
在下圖中,我們放大了RxSight的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RxSight?
機構所有權告訴我們關於RxSight什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in RxSight. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of RxSight, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在RxSight中擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者之間有一定的可信度。但我們不能單靠這些事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,與其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價劇烈下跌也並不罕見。因此,查看RxSight過去的收益軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,記住還要考慮其他因素。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RxSight. Our data shows that RA Capital Management, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. With 6.9% and 5.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Ronald Kurtz directly holds 2.1% of the total shares outstanding.
機構投資者持有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以強有力地影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在RxSight的股份不多。我們的數據表明,RA資本管理公司是最大股東,擁有9.7%的流通股份。貝萊德公司和先鋒集團分別是第二和第三大股東,分別持有6.9%和5.7%的流通股份。此外,公司的首席執行官羅納德·庫爾茨直接持有2.1%的流通股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到前17名股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of RxSight
RxSight的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in RxSight, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$75m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,RxSight, Inc.的內部人士持有一些股份。 這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的統一是件好事。內部人士持有價值7500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士如此投資是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有購買。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有11%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。 雖然這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以在公司政策上產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 9.7%, private equity firms could influence the RxSight board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
持有9.7%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響RxSight的董事會。一些人可能會喜歡這種情況,因爲股權投資有時是活躍的,能夠讓管理層負責。但有時,股權投資也在出售,因爲它們已經讓公司上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for RxSight that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體的所有權是非常有意義的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了一個關於RxSight的警告信號,您在這裏投資之前應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。