DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603233) Market Cap Increased by CN¥649m, Insiders Receive a 65% Cut
DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603233) Market Cap Increased by CN¥649m, Insiders Receive a 65% Cut
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 3 shareholders own 57% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 内部人士似乎对大参林药品集团的增长有既得利益,正如他们的股份所有权所显示的那样。
- 前3大股东持有公司57%的股份。
- 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景
To get a sense of who is truly in control of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603233), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 65% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制着大参林药品集团有限公司(SHSE:603233),理解公司业务的所有权结构是很重要的。内部人士持有65%的股份,拥有公司最高的股票份额。也就是说,如果股票上涨,集团将获得最大的利益(或者如果出现下跌,则会损失最大)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 3.6% gain.
因此,内部人士是上周3.6%涨幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group.
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于大参林药品集团不同的持股群体。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group?
机构持股告诉我们关于大参林药品集团什么信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在大参林药品集团中拥有相当的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一点,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,正如其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时出售一只股票,股票价格大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看大参林药品集团过去的营业收入轨迹(如下)是值得的。当然,还需要考虑其他因素。

DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Yun Feng Ke, with ownership of 21%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 20% and 16% of the stock.
大参林药品集团并不被对冲基金持有。公司的最大股东是云风凯,持股21%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约20%和16%的股票。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究显示,三位顶级股东通过57%的持股量在公司中拥有相当大的所有权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group
大参林药品集团的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Insiders own CN¥12b worth of shares in the CN¥18b company. That's extraordinary! It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
我们的信息显示,内部人士拥有大参林药品集团有限公司超过一半的股份。这使他们有效控制了公司。内部人士持有价值120亿人民币的股份,而公司总值为180亿人民币。这真是非同寻常!看到这样的投资水平真是好消息。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否有出售他们的股份。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众的持股比例为26%,主要由个人投资者组成,对大参林药品集团有一定影响力。虽然这样的持股比例可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group .
我发现查看一家公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意到我们发现的关于大参林药品集团的 2 个警告信号。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。