Individual Investors Invested in Singapore Post Limited (SGX:S08) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's S$68m Market Cap Decline
Individual Investors Invested in Singapore Post Limited (SGX:S08) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's S$68m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over Singapore Post by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 43% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 個人投資者對新加坡郵政的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
- 前 25 名股東擁有公司 43% 的股份
- 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以讓人們對企業前景有一個深刻的了解
Every investor in Singapore Post Limited (SGX:S08) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 57% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
新加坡郵政有限公司(SGX: S08)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲57%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
As market cap fell to S$1.3b last week, individual investors would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着上週市值跌至13億新元,個人投資者面臨的損失將超過該公司任何其他股東群體。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Singapore Post.
在下圖中,我們放大了新加坡郵政的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Singapore Post?
關於新加坡郵政,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
Singapore Post already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Singapore Post's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
新加坡郵政已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到新加坡郵政的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Singapore Post is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Singapore Telecommunications Limited with 22% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 2.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
新加坡郵政不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是新加坡電信有限公司,已發行股份的22%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的11%和2.5%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我們的所有權數據後發現,前25名股東共持有不到一半的股份,這表明在很大一部分小股東中,沒有一個單一股東佔多數。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Singapore Post
新加坡郵政的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Singapore Post Limited in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It seems the board members have no more than S$6.5m worth of shares in the S$1.3b company. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有新加坡郵政有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能會通過我們尚未採用的公司結構獲得間接利益。看來董事會成員在這家13億新元的公司中持有的股份不超過650萬新元。許多人傾向於看到一個擁有更多股權的董事會。一個不錯的下一步可能是看看這份免費的內幕買入和賣出摘要。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 57% stake in Singapore Post, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有新加坡郵政57%的大量股份,這表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行使投票權。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 33% of Singapore Post stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
上市公司目前擁有新加坡郵政33%的股票。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Singapore Post better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Singapore Post that you should be aware of.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解新加坡郵政,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經爲新加坡郵政確定了一個警告標誌,你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。