China Leadshine Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002979) Market Cap Dropped CN¥377m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
China Leadshine Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002979) Market Cap Dropped CN¥377m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
关键洞察
- China Leadshine Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders own 45% of China Leadshine Technology
- 雷赛智能的主要个人投资者的持股比例表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响。
- 前十大股东拥有公司50%的股份
- 内幕人士拥有雷赛智能45%的股份。
If you want to know who really controls China Leadshine Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002979), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 47% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制雷赛智能有限公司(SZSE:002979),那么你需要查看其股份登记的组成。个人投资者拥有47%的股份,是公司最大股东。即,如果股票上涨,个人投资者将获益最多(如果出现下跌,则损失也最大)。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 3.6% price drop, insiders with their 45% also suffered.
虽然个人投资者在上周价格下跌3.6%后持有的股份受到了影响,但持有45%的内部人士也遭受了损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of China Leadshine Technology.
在下面的图表中,我们关注雷赛智能的不同股东群体。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Leadshine Technology?
机构股东拥有雷赛智能的股份。的确,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师已经研究了该股票并且他们持有买入观点。但是,像其他人一样,他们也可能犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的观点,该公司的股价可能会快速下降。因此,值得注意的是,下面介绍雷赛智能的营收历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Leadshine Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Leadshine Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在雷赛智能中持有相当一部分股份。这表明该公司在投资界有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓认可保持警惕。他们有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总会有风险,可能出现"拥挤交易"。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会争相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以看到雷赛智能的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,背后总有更多的故事。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Leadshine Technology. With a 35% stake, CEO Weiping Li is the largest shareholder. Huimin Shi is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and Sinowisdom Capital holds about 1.4% of the company stock.
我们注意到对雷赛智能的对冲基金没有进行实质性的投资。 CEO李伟平拥有35%的股份,是最大股东。 石惠敏是第二大股东,持有8.0%的普通股,Sinowisdom Capital持有约1.4%的公司股票。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前十大股东占股份登记的一半以上,还有一些较小的股东在一定程度上平衡了大股东的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
虽然研究公司机构持股可以为您的研究增值,但也建议研究分析师的建议,以更深入了解股票的预期表现。该股票的分析师覆盖较少,但也不是很多。因此,它有机会获得更多的覆盖。
Insider Ownership Of China Leadshine Technology
似乎内部人持有雷赛智能公司的很大比例。内部人持有价值26亿元的股票,而该市值为57亿元。这可能意味着创始人仍然拥有很多股份。可以点击这里查看他们是否在买卖。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in China Leadshine Technology Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥4.6b stake in this CN¥10b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在雷赛智能科技有限公司持有显著股份。观察到内部人士在这一100亿人民币的业务中拥有46亿人民币的有效股份非常有趣。大多数人会说这显示出与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在这样规模的公司中。您可以点击此处查看那些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in China Leadshine Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在雷赛智能持有47%的股份。尽管这种规模的拥有权可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他因素更为重要。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
许多人发现深入分析公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问这一详细的历史营业收入、营业收入和现金流的图表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。