Individual Investors Who Hold 57% of Dynamic Holdings Limited (HKG:29) Gained 22%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 57% of Dynamic Holdings Limited (HKG:29) Gained 22%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Dynamic Holdings' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
- Insiders own 43% of Dynamic Holdings
- 動態控股的重大個人投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到更廣大股東的影響。
- 共有8位投資者在該公司中擁有43%的控股權。
- 內部人士持有動態控股43%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of Dynamic Holdings Limited (HKG:29) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
觀察動態控股有限公司(HKG:29)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有最大份額的群體是個人投資者,擁有57%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者在市場下行時損失最多)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched HK$2.5b last week, while insiders who own 43% also benefitted.
個別投資者在市值達到25億港元后獲得了最大的收益,而持有43%的內部人士也同樣受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Dynamic Holdings.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關動態控股的信息。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dynamic Holdings?
缺乏機構持股對動態控股意味着什麼?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我們通常不看到機構投資者持有非常風險高、流動性低或非常小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時會看到沒有機構註冊的大公司,但這並不常見。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Dynamic Holdings, for yourself, below.
機構不持有某隻股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的原因是公司相對於管理的資金規模太小,因此機構不會仔細關注該公司。另一方面,專業投資者可能在規避某家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是投資的最佳選擇。機構投資者可能並不認爲這家公司的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。您可以在下面看到動態控股過去營業收入的表現。
Dynamic Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Domingo Chua, with ownership of 39%. The second and third largest shareholders are Lucio Tan and Carmen Tan, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 0.9%. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company.
動態控股並不被對沖基金擁有。公司的最大股東是Domingo Chua,持有39%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是Lucio Tan和Carmen Tan,他們持有相等的股份,均爲0.9%。有趣的是,前三大股東中排名最後的兩位還擔任董事會成員和高級關鍵執行官的職稱,這表明這些內部人士對公司有個人投資。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 8 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
更深入地查看我們的股權數據,前8大股東共持有不到一半的股份,表明存在一大群小股東,且沒有單一股東擁有大多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究一個公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但同時研究分析師的推薦也是一個很好的做法,以更深入了解股票的預期表現。我們提供的信息表明該股票沒有分析師的覆蓋,因而可能知名度不高。
Insider Ownership Of Dynamic Holdings
動態控股的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Dynamic Holdings Limited. It has a market capitalization of just HK$2.5b, and insiders have HK$1.1b worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在動態控股有限公司持有相當大的股份。其市值僅爲25億港元,而內部人士名下的股份價值爲11億港元。我們認爲這表明與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;某些內部人士可能是公司創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 57% of Dynamic Holdings shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,集體持有動態控股57%的股份。這種所有權水平賦予了來自更廣泛公衆的投資者一定的權力,以影響關鍵政策決策,如董事會組成、管理層薪酬和股息支付比例。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Dynamic Holdings that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。舉例來說,我們發現了1個關於動態控股的警告信號,在您投資之前應該了解這一點。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。