Institutional Owners May Ignore Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688099) Recent CN¥1.2b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:688099) Recent CN¥1.2b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 由于机构在该股票中持有大量股份,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前六大股东持有公司51%的股份
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688099), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 38% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
为了了解谁真正控制着晶晨股份(上海)有限公司(SHSE:688099),了解该业务的所有权结构是很重要的。持有公司最多股份的集团,大约占38%,就是机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大收益(或者在出现下跌时损失最大)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to CN¥32b last week. However, the 21% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
机构投资者是上周公司市值降至320亿人民币后受影响最大的群体。然而,给股东带来的21%的年度回报可能减轻了一些打击。然而,我们假设他们会留意未来的弱点。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd.
在下图中,我们关注晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的不同股东群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd?
机构持股对我们了解晶晨股份(上海)有限公司有什么启示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
We can see that Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,晶晨股份(上海)有限公司确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一大部分。这在专业投资者中表明了一定的可信度。但我们不能单靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,查看晶晨股份(上海)有限公司过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd. Amlogic (Hong Kong) Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 26% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd. and China Asset Management Co. Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.6%.
对冲基金在晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的股票不多。晶晨股份(香港)有限公司目前是最大的股东,持有26%的流通股份。第二和第三大股东分别是AEGON-工业基金管理有限公司和中国资产管理有限公司,持有相等数量的股份,各占6.6%。
We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了更多的挖掘,发现前六大股东大约占股东注册的51%,这意味着除了大股东,还有一些小股东,从而在某种程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd
晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终被算作内部人。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,特别是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Amlogic (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥3.2m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有的晶晨股份(上海)有限公司的股份少于1%。不过,我们注意到,内部人士可能通过一家私营公司或其他公司结构间接持有利益。这是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员可以在不持有太多比例股份的情况下,拥有公司的相当大权益。在这种情况下,他们持有约320万人民币的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,近期的买卖同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众,包括散户投资者,持有该公司27%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这一群体不一定能决定公司事务,但确实可以对公司运行产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 34%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到,私营公司拥有34%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究一下这些私营公司的所有者。有时,内部人士或其他相关方通过一个独立的私营公司对一家上市公司的股份有投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Amlogic (Shanghai)Ltd has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
考虑不同持有公司股份的群体总是值得的。但为了更好地了解晶晨股份(上海)有限公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如,风险 - 我们认为晶晨股份(上海)有限公司有 3 个警告信号,您应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。