Here's Why Newmont (NYSE:NEM) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Here's Why Newmont (NYSE:NEM) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Newmont Corporation (NYSE:NEM) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過:『波動性遠非風險的同義詞。』在考察一家公司的風險時,自然要考慮其資產負債表,因爲債務通常與企業的崩潰有關。值得注意的是,紐曼礦業(紐交所:NEM)確實存在債務。但股東應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果一家公司無法償還其借款人,那麼它就處於借款人的支配之下。資本主義的一個重要組成部分是「創造性毀滅」的過程,失敗的企業會被其銀行家無情解散。雖然情況並不常見,但我們常常會看到負債公司因債權人迫使他們以困境價格融資而永久稀釋股東權益。儘管如此,最常見的情況是公司合理管理其債務,並使其自身受益。在考慮一家公司使用多少債務時,首先要看看其現金和債務的整體情況。
What Is Newmont's Net Debt?
紐曼礦業的淨債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Newmont had US$8.55b of debt, an increase on US$5.58b, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$3.06b, its net debt is less, at about US$5.49b.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示截至2024年9月,紐曼礦業的債務爲85.5億美金,相比一年前的55.8億美金有所增加。然而,由於它有30.6億美金的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,約爲54.9億美金。
How Strong Is Newmont's Balance Sheet?
紐曼礦業的資產負債表有多強?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Newmont had liabilities of US$6.41b due within a year, and liabilities of US$19.9b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$3.06b in cash and US$974.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$22.2b.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,紐曼礦業在一年內到期的負債爲64.1億美元,而在此之後到期的負債爲199億美元。對此,它擁有30.6億美元的現金和97400萬美元的應收款項,在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債超出了現金和(短期)應收款項的總和222億美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Newmont has a huge market capitalization of US$42.9b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
雖然這看起來不少,但這並不算太糟,因爲紐曼礦業的市值高達429億美元,因此如果需要的話,它可能會通過融資來增強資產負債表。但我們確實要對其債務帶來的過大風險保持警惕。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
爲了評估一家公司的債務相對於其收益的情況,我們計算其淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,以及息稅利潤(EBIT)與利息費用(即利息覆蓋)的比率。這種方法的優點在於我們同時考慮到債務的絕對數額(使用淨債務與EBITDA的比率)和與該債務相關的實際利息支出(使用利息覆蓋率)。
Newmont's net debt is only 0.91 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 14.9 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Even more impressive was the fact that Newmont grew its EBIT by 184% over twelve months. That boost will make it even easier to pay down debt going forward. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Newmont's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
紐曼礦業的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.91倍。而其EBIT足以支付其利息支出14.9倍。因此,我們對其極爲保守的債務使用感到相當放鬆。更令人印象深刻的是,紐曼礦業在過去12個月中,其EBIT增長了184%。這一增長將使其未來償還債務變得更加容易。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中可以了解到大部分債務情況。但未來的收益,尤其是將決定紐曼礦業在未來保持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你也許會覺得有關分析師利潤預測的這份免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Newmont recorded free cash flow worth 64% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法滿足。因此,查看這部分EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持是值得的。在最近三年中,紐曼礦業記錄的自由現金流佔其EBIT的64%,這一比例相對正常,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅收。這筆冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
The good news is that Newmont's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its level of total liabilities. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like Newmont is pretty sensible with its use of debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Newmont that you should be aware of before investing here.
好消息是,紐曼礦業展示了用EBIT覆蓋利息支出的能力,就像蓬鬆的小狗讓幼兒高興一樣。 但從更嚴肅的角度來看,我們對其總負債水平感到有些擔憂。 當我們考慮上述因素的區間時,似乎紐曼礦業在使用債務方面相當理智。這意味着他們承擔了一些額外的風險,以期提升股東回報。當你分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。例如,我們發現了1個警告信號,您在此投資之前應該了解紐曼礦業。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
無論最終結果如何,有時候更容易關注那些根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費獲取一份淨債務爲零的成長股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。