share_log

Investor Group SIAS Calls for Independent Inquiry in SingPost Exec Dismissals

Investor Group SIAS Calls for Independent Inquiry in SingPost Exec Dismissals

投資者集團SIAS呼籲對新郵政高管解僱進行獨立調查
Singapore Business Review ·  01/06 14:25

The group said this points to an 'extremely serious' breach of rules.

該組織表示,這表明 「極其嚴重」 地違反了規則。

Securities Investors Association(Singapore) (SIAS) is calling for an independent professional inquiry into the circumstances leading to the dismissal of three key executives of Singapore Post Limited over the mishandling of whistleblower allegations.

證券投資者協會(新加坡)(SIAS)呼籲對導致新加坡郵政有限公司三名主要高管因舉報人指控處理不當而被解僱的情況進行獨立的專業調查。

Vincent Phang, group CEO, Li Yu, CEO of the group's international business, and the group's CFO Vincent Yik were dismissed after it was revealed that the trio were 'grossly negligent and had omitted to consider material facts that compromised their decision-making and/or failed to perform their duties responsibly and reliably.'

集團首席執行官彭文森特、集團國際業務首席執行官李宇和集團財務長文森特·伊克被解僱,原因是有消息稱,這三人 「嚴重疏忽,沒有考慮影響其決策和/或未能負責任和可靠地履行職責的重大事實」。

In a letter dated 2 January, David Gerald, Founder, President and CEO of SIAS said the the sudden dismissal of three senior executives from SingPost, coupled with their vigorous denial of the allegations against them, has raised critical questions in the minds of shareholders, investors and the market.

SIAS創始人、總裁兼首席執行官戴維·傑拉爾德在1月2日的一封信中表示,新加坡郵政突然解僱了三名高級管理人員,加上他們堅決否認了對他們的指控,這在股東、投資者和市場心目中引發了關鍵問題。

"The fact that they were told to leave with immediate effect points to an extremely serious breach of the rules which in turn necessitates detailed explanations. Yet it has to be said that the disclosures from the company and the responses from the three executives thus far raise more questions than provide answers," Gerald said.

「他們被告知立即離開,這一事實表明存在極其嚴重的違反規則的行爲,這反過來又需要詳細解釋。然而,必須說,到目前爲止,該公司的披露和三位高管的回應提出的問題多於提供的答案,」 傑拉爾德說。

Gerald also questioned if the board was the appropriate body to lead the investigation and if the Group Internal Audit (GIA) department has the necessary skills and expertise to objectively conduct the probe as well as how many staff are there in GIA.

Gerald 還質疑董事會是否是領導調查的適當機構,集團內部審計 (GIA) 部門是否具備客觀地進行調查所需的技能和專業知識,以及 GIA 有多少員工。

Gerald also said, citing SingPost's statement released last 29 December, that it appears that the three affected individuals knew of the GIA's findings as early as 11 March 2024 but nevertheless delivered false testimony three times.

傑拉爾德還援引新加坡郵報去年12月29日發佈的聲明說,看來這三名受影響的人早在2024年3月11日就知道了GIA的發現,但還是提供了三次虛假證詞。

"However, Messrs Phang and Yik in their 31 Dec release have stated that they were interviewed on only two occasions and not three between 11 March-3 April, these being on 11 March and 3 April. Furthermore, they state that when they were interviewed, they were not privy to the GIA's findings and so "responded accordingly based on the facts that were provided'' to them at the time, these facts presumably coming from the departments concerned. They further stated that it was only on 27 April 2024 when the external forensics team's investigations came to light that they had full knowledge. So how many times were Messrs Phang and Yik interviewed, was it two or three? When did these two gentlemen know of the GIA's findings, was it 11 March or 27 April? What about Mr Li? Was he interviewed two or three times?" Gerald said.

「但是,彭先生和伊克先生在12月31日獲釋時表示,他們只接受了兩次採訪,而不是在3月11日至4月3日期間的三次採訪,分別是3月11日至4月3日。此外,他們表示,在接受採訪時,他們對美國寶石研究院的調查結果一無所知,因此 「根據當時提供給他們的事實做出了相應的回應」,這些事實可能來自有關部門。他們進一步表示,直到2024年4月27日,外部取證小組的調查才曝光,他們才完全了解情況。那麼 Phang 和 Yik 先生接受了多少次採訪,是兩三次嗎?這兩位先生什麼時候得知 GIA 的發現,是 3 月 11 日還是 4 月 27 日?那李先生呢?他接受了兩三次採訪嗎?」傑拉爾德說。

"Only through a wholly independent inquiry can transparency, accountability, and trust in SingPost's governance be fully restored."

「只有通過完全獨立的調查,才能完全恢復透明度、問責制和對新加坡郵政治理的信任。」

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論