Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Genuine Parts implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 22 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 机构在Genuine Parts的持股比例很大,这意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响。
- 共有22位投资者在公司中持有50%的控股权
- 高管近期的卖出行为
A look at the shareholders of Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看Genuine Parts Company(纽交所:GPC)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。持有公司最多股份的群体,准确来说约占82%,是机构。换句话说,这个群体从他们对公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构投资者拥有巨大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,机构投资在公司中的占比被普遍视为积极特征。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Genuine Parts.
在下面的图表中,我们详细观察了Genuine Parts的不同持股集团。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Genuine Parts?
机构持股告诉我们关于Genuine Parts什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Genuine Parts. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Genuine Parts' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所见,机构投资者在Genuine Parts中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明公司在投资圈中具有一定的信誉。然而,依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证最好保持谨慎。他们也有可能犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞争快速售出股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Genuine Parts的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的背景。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Genuine Parts. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.6% by the third-largest shareholder.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对冲基金在Genuine Parts中的股份不多。先锋集团目前是公司的最大股东,持有12%的流通股份。为了作个对比,第二大股东持有约7.9%的流通股份,第三大股东持有5.6%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 22 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过进一步的深挖,我们发现前22名股东对公司的合计持股为50%,这表明没有任何单一股东对公司拥有显著控制权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构的持有情况是判断和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。目前有合理数量的分析师在覆盖此股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有用。
Insider Ownership Of Genuine Parts
Genuine Parts的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能具有主观性,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终需要对董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或CEO的情况下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Genuine Parts Company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$61m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人拥有Genuine Parts Company不到1%的股份。 这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人拥有公司较大比例的股份会让人感到惊讶。尽管他们的持股不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员总共拥有价值6100万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员拥有股票是好的,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众——包括零售投资者——在该公司拥有18%的股份,因此不可轻易忽视。 虽然这种所有权规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不同步,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Genuine Parts you should know about.
我发现研究谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。考虑风险,例如。每家公司都有风险,我们发现了关于Genuine Parts的一个警告信号,你应该知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。