share_log

IGG (HKG:799) Will Be Hoping To Turn Its Returns On Capital Around

IGG (HKG:799) Will Be Hoping To Turn Its Returns On Capital Around

IGG (HKG:799) 將希望扭轉其資本回報。
Simply Wall St ·  01/09 07:10

Ignoring the stock price of a company, what are the underlying trends that tell us a business is past the growth phase? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. So after glancing at the trends within IGG (HKG:799), we weren't too hopeful.

忽略一家公司的股票價格,我們可以通過哪些潛在趨勢判斷該業務已經過了增長階段?一個潛在衰退的業務通常表現出兩個趨勢:一個是資本回報率(ROCE)逐漸下降,另一個是投入資本的基礎也在下降。這些趨勢最終意味着該業務正在減少投資,同時在所投入的資金上獲得更少的收益。因此,在瀏覽IGG(HKG:799)的趨勢後,我們沒有太多希望。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

資本回報率(ROCE):它是什麼?

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on IGG is:

對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人來說,它衡量的是公司能夠利用其投入業務的資本生成的稅前利潤的數量。IGG的計算公式爲:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)

0.25 = HK$750m ÷ (HK$4.1b - HK$1.1b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.25 = HK$75000萬 ÷ (HK$41億 - HK$1.1b) (基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月數據)。

Therefore, IGG has an ROCE of 25%. In absolute terms that's a great return and it's even better than the Entertainment industry average of 11%.

因此,IGG的資本回報率爲25%。從絕對值來看,這是一個很好的回報,甚至優於娛樂行業平均水平的11%。

big
SEHK:799 Return on Capital Employed January 8th 2025
SEHK:799 資本回報率 2025年1月8日

In the above chart we have measured IGG's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for IGG .

在上面的圖表中,我們測量了IGG之前的資本回報率(ROCE)與其之前的表現,但未來顯然更爲重要。如果您想了解分析師對未來的預測,您應該查看我們爲IGG提供的免費分析師報告。

What Does the ROCE Trend For IGG Tell Us?

IGG的ROCE趨勢告訴我們什麼?

In terms of IGG's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. About five years ago, returns on capital were 57%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Since returns are falling and the business has the same amount of assets employed, this can suggest it's a mature business that hasn't had much growth in the last five years. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on IGG becoming one if things continue as they have.

就IGG的歷史ROCE變動而言,趨勢並不令人信服。大約五年前,資本回報率爲57%,但如上所示,現在大大低於這個水平。更值得注意的是,企業所使用的資本數量保持相對穩定。由於回報在下降而企業使用的資產數量沒有變化,這可能表明這是一個在過去五年中沒有太多增長的成熟企業。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創造多倍收益,如果情況保持不變,我們不會對IGG成爲一個多倍收益股抱有太大期待。

Our Take On IGG's ROCE

我們對IGG的ROCE的看法

In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Long term shareholders who've owned the stock over the last five years have experienced a 32% depreciation in their investment, so it appears the market might not like these trends either. That being the case, unless the underlying trends revert to a more positive trajectory, we'd consider looking elsewhere.

最後,在相同資本金額下回報率下降的趨勢通常不是我們在尋找成長型股票的標誌。在過去五年中,長揸該股票的股東經歷了投資價值的32%貶值,因此市場似乎也不喜歡這些趨勢。既然如此,除非基本趨勢恢復到更積極的軌道,否則我們會考慮尋找其他機會。

IGG does come with some risks though, we found 2 warning signs in our investment analysis, and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...

不過,IGG確實存在一些風險,我們在投資分析中發現了兩個警示信號,其中一個令我們感到不安……

High returns are a key ingredient to strong performance, so check out our free list ofstocks earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

高回報是強勁表現的關鍵要素,因此請查看我們提供的高股本回報率且資產負債表穩健的股票的免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論