Retail Investors Who Hold 42% of Inly Media Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603598) Gained 13%, Insiders Profited as Well
Retail Investors Who Hold 42% of Inly Media Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603598) Gained 13%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Inly Media by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Inly Media is 37%
- 散戶對引力傳媒的重大控制意味着公衆在影響管理和治理相關決策方面擁有更大的權力
- 公司的50%由前三大股東持有
- 引力傳媒的內部持股爲37%
A look at the shareholders of Inly Media Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603598) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看引力傳媒有限公司(SHSE:603598)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個團體最強大。我們可以看到,散戶在公司中擁有42%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,散戶這一群體將獲得最大的利益(如果出現下跌,他們將損失最多)。
Following a 13% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but insiders who own 37% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
在上週股票價格上漲13%之後,散戶投資者獲利最多,而持有37%股票的內部人士也從中獲利。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Inly Media.
在下面的圖表中,我們詳細分析了引力傳媒的不同股權結構。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inly Media?
機構持股告訴我們關於引力傳媒什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Inly Media does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Inly Media, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到引力傳媒確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是像其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。因此,如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時出售一隻股票,股票價格大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看引力傳媒過去的收益軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Inly Media is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Yan Ji Luo is the largest shareholder with 37% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.6% by the third-largest shareholder.
引力傳媒並不被對沖基金所擁有。我們的數據表明,閻季洛是最大的股東,持有37%的流通股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約7.4%的流通股份,第三大股東的持股比例爲5.6%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前3名股東共同控制超過一半的公司股份,這意味着他們在影響公司的決策方面具有相當大的權力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒也很重要,以了解市場的動向。目前我們沒有獲取到該股票的任何分析師覆蓋數據,因此公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Inly Media
引力傳媒的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Inly Media Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.1b stake in this CN¥5.5b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看來內部人士持有引力傳媒的相當一部分股份。內部人士在這個規模爲55億人民幣的業務中擁有21億人民幣的股份。我們認爲這表明與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,這家公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是該業務的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 42% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司的42%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 7.4%, of the Inly Media stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司持有引力傳媒7.4%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查這些私人公司的擁有者。有時,內部人士或其他相關方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份有利益關係。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Inly Media has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現了解究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如風險——引力傳媒有3個警示信號我們認爲你應該注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
評論(0)
請選擇舉報原因